Tony Bernardin writes:
> Hey, I'm having a little trouble understanding the conversion gcc is
> doing in a statement with the following types:
This question is not appropriate for the mailing list gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
which is for gcc developers. It would be appropriate for
gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org. P
Hey, I'm having a little trouble understanding the conversion gcc is
doing in a statement with the following types:
int64 = int32 * uint32
This is running on a 64bit machine with gcc (GCC) 4.4.2 20091027 (Red
Hat 4.4.2-7)
Following simple code snippet:
1 #include
2 #include
3
4 using
I'd like to obsolete support for some older versions of IRIX, Solaris,
and Tru64 UNIX which get increasingly difficult and time consuming to
support. The plan is to obsolete them in the GCC 4.5 release and remove
the support in GCC 4.6. That means that in GCC 4.5.x, an attempt to
configure for th
Thanks for the detailed answer.
While we're on the subject of assign_hard_reg, I notice the costs and
min_cost variable are set but never used (decisions are being made with
the full_costs array and min_full_cost). Should they be referenced
somehow or are they just redundant?
Cheers,
Ian
>
Hi,
I have declared a builtin that receives a function pointer in gcc 4.3.4.
While handling the builtin I want to find the assembler name of the
function the pointer points to.
My current code works if the the function is a void (*)(void), but it
doesn't work for anything else and unfortunately,
