On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 23:33 +0200, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 12:00 +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:08:00 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > >On 12.08.2009 23:07, Martin Guy wrote:
> > >> On 8/12/09, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > >>> So any ACATS results f
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 03:45:38PM -0500, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 13:25, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> > I am doing this right now. I will first merge trunk into graphite
> > branch and then commit all the changes from graphite to trunk (modulo
> > some changes that should remain i
Steve Ellcey writes:
> I have a question about the check for -rdynamic in gcc/configure.
> What we have in configure.ac is:
>
> # Check -rdynamic
> LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -rdynamic"
> AC_MSG_CHECKING([for -rdynamic])
> AC_TRY_LINK([],[return 0;],
> [AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]); have_rdynamic=yes]
I have a question about the check for -rdynamic in gcc/configure.
What we have in configure.ac is:
# Check -rdynamic
LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -rdynamic"
AC_MSG_CHECKING([for -rdynamic])
AC_TRY_LINK([],[return 0;],
[AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]); have_rdynamic=yes],
[AC_MSG_RESULT([no])])
if tes
David Daney wrote:
> Tom Tromey wrote:
>>> "Dave" == Dave Korn writes:
>>
>> Dave> There are a couple of regressions to solve first, but it appears
>> Dave> that I've more-or-less cracked it. Full details are written up
>> Dave> here:
>>
>> Dave> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Internal_depen
On 08/27/09 04:04, Alex Turjan wrote:
With 4.4, IRA happens to reuse the same register for both pseudos, so
sched2 is hand tied and cannot schedule them back again for us.
I can imagine compiling other programs for which preserving the 4.3 allocation
will induce performance degradation du
Tom Tromey wrote:
"Dave" == Dave Korn writes:
Dave> There are a couple of regressions to solve first, but it appears
Dave> that I've more-or-less cracked it. Full details are written up
Dave> here:
Dave> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Internal_dependencies_of_libgcj
One thing worth conside
> "Dave" == Dave Korn writes:
Dave> There are a couple of regressions to solve first, but it appears
Dave> that I've more-or-less cracked it. Full details are written up
Dave> here:
Dave> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Internal_dependencies_of_libgcj
One thing worth considering is that yo
On 08/28/2009 06:51 AM, Mohamed Shafi wrote:
Hello all,
I am trying to port a 32bit arch in GCC 4.4.0. My target has support
for 1bit, 2bit shift and add operations. I tried to write patterns for
this , but gcc is not generating those. The following are the patterns
that i have written in md fil
oliver.kell...@t-online.de (Oliver Kellogg) writes:
> In multi source compile mode, I ggc_free() the data in dwarf2out.c after
> code generation for a file is done. (I found that I need this because
> otherwise the assembly code generated for file_2 to file_N of a compile
> job will carry leftover
Hello all,
I am trying to port a 32bit arch in GCC 4.4.0. My target has support
for 1bit, 2bit shift and add operations. I tried to write patterns for
this , but gcc is not generating those. The following are the patterns
that i have written in md file:
(define_insn "shift_add_"
[(set (match_ope
Hi Joel,
Joel Sherrill wrote:
> I can't seem to find the patch. Do you have a link?
The initial submission, with a description of the problem we were
having, is at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-01/msg00759.html
We have been using a slightly adjusted version for our gcc 4.3 based
lin
On MIPS, PIC calls are indirect calls that need to be dispatched via an ABI
mandated register. At expansion time we load the symbol into a pseudo then
expand the call. There is a linker optimization that can turn these indirect
calls into direct calls under some circumstances. This can improve b
13 matches
Mail list logo