raja.sal...@iap-online.com writes:
> Can anybody explain about the unspec_volatile() rtl template usage, sample
> example and the purpose of it.
unspec_volatile is documented in the gcc internals manual. There are
many examples of using it in the existing gcc backends. The purpose
is to permit
Hi,
I am using the gcc version 3.4.6. It is cross built for one of the ARM
based target. I would like to build the gcc in debug mode and step by step
debug the code.
The gcc/configure has "-g -O2" option. but if I run through debugger, the
source files of the entire gcc are not visible.
somebody
Hi,
Can anybody explain about the unspec_volatile() rtl template usage, sample
example and the purpose of it.
Thanks and Regards
Raja Saleru
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 04:06, Sean Callanan wrote:
> We also have a magic argument called FILE that lets you load arguments from
> a file.
That's what @ arguments are for. Which argues for not concatenating arguments.
Would it be a problem to do
-plugin=myplugin -plugin-myplugin-arg1=stuff -pl
Ross Ridge wrote:
> Oh, ok, that makes a world of difference. Even with just AMD GPU
> support a GCC-based OpenCL implementation becomes a lot more practical.
Michael Meissner writes:
>And bear in mind that x86's with GPUs are not the only platform of interest
I never said anything about x86's a
Ross Ridge wrote:
Basile STARYNKEVITCH writes:
It seems to me that some specifications
seems to be available. I am not a GPU expert, but
http://developer.amd.com/documentation/guides/Pages/default.aspx
contains a R8xx Family Instruction Set Archictectire document at
http://developer.amd.com/gpu_
Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39076 appears to be an
> reappearance of the failure reported originally at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-04/msg01577.html . and detailed
> discussion in the thread that ends at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/m
2009/2/3 Sean Callanan :
> --
> -Wl,option
> Pass option as an option to the linker. If option contains
> commas,
> it is split into multiple options at the commas.
> --
> So perhaps we could do something like
> --
> -Wplugin-$NAME,arg=value
>
I apologise if this sounds bikesh
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Michael Meissner
wrote:
> And bear in mind that x86's with GPUs are not the only platform of interest.
Even x86 with the SPRUS engine is a platform of interest for some
companies (not me but you get the idea).
-- Pinski
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 04:37:55PM -0500, Ross Ridge wrote:
>
> Basile STARYNKEVITCH writes:
> >It seems to me that some specifications
> >seems to be available. I am not a GPU expert, but
> >http://developer.amd.com/documentation/guides/Pages/default.aspx
> >contains a R8xx Family Instruction Set
Hi Mark,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39076 appears to be an
reappearance of the failure reported originally at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-04/msg01577.html . and detailed
discussion in the thread that ends at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-06/msg00907.html .
Is
Basile STARYNKEVITCH writes:
>It seems to me that some specifications
>seems to be available. I am not a GPU expert, but
>http://developer.amd.com/documentation/guides/Pages/default.aspx
>contains a R8xx Family Instruction Set Archictectire document at
>http://developer.amd.com/gpu_assets/r600isa.
Dear gcc.gnu.org
I mirrored the ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc to
http://robotlab.itk.ppke.hu/gcc
country: Hungary
city: Budapest
contact:
name: Adam Rak (Ádám Rák)
e-mail: neur...@gmail.com
The mirror is updated daily. I can configure it to be more frequent if
you require.
Best wishes:
Ádám Rák
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Ross Ridge wrote:
> Mark Mitchell writes:
> >That's correct. I was envisioning a proper compiler that would take
> >OpenCL input and generate binary output, for a particular target, just
> >as with all other GCC input languages. That target might be a GPU, or
> >it might be a
Ross Ridge wrote:
Mark Mitchell writes:
That's correct. I was envisioning a proper compiler that would take
OpenCL input and generate binary output, for a particular target, just
as with all other GCC input languages. That target might be a GPU, or
it might be a multi-core CPU, or it might
Mark Mitchell writes:
>That's correct. I was envisioning a proper compiler that would take
>OpenCL input and generate binary output, for a particular target, just
>as with all other GCC input languages. That target might be a GPU, or
>it might be a multi-core CPU, or it might be a single-core CPU
Rather than invent a new quoting syntax, why not just split the
arguments up? If each a plugin has a name, you could use that name in
subsequent -f arguments. E.g., if the name of the plugin in
"plugin.so" is "foo", perhaps:
-fplugin=/path/to/plugin.so -ffoo-arg1=value1 -ffoo-arg2=value2
Th
> "Sean" == Sean Callanan writes:
>> (3) The -fplugin-arg argument is one way to do arguments. We do it as
>> -ftree-plugin=/path/to/plugin.so:arg=value:arg=value:...
Benjamin> I'm a little worried about the colon separator. Windows file
Benjamin> paths may legally have colons. Is there s
> > On an (possibly) off-topic note, it seems that gmp requires GNU ld, but GCC
> > needs the native ld.
>
> Neither is supposed to be true (and I've built GMP with Sun ld and GCC with
> GNU ld many times).
I didn't take notes, and you wouldn't find my configuration very
useful (much symlinking
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 09:40:20AM -0800, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
> On Feb 3, 2009, at 8:48 AM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>
> >Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
> >
> >>Obviously, a library is not enough for a heterogeneous system, or
> >>am I missing anything from your description? As I know, e.g. there
>
> On an (possibly) off-topic note, it seems that gmp requires GNU ld, but GCC
> needs the native ld.
Neither is supposed to be true (and I've built GMP with Sun ld and GCC with
GNU ld many times).
--
Eric Botcazou
Dennis Clarke:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 converted... ]
>
> >> > I'll try sparc64, powerpc64 and ia64 when the machines are available.
> >>
> >> I can probably help you with the Sparc64 requirement. To be precise, do
> >> you need Sun UltraSparc or are you looking for the multicore SPARC64
> >> process
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2009, at 8:48 AM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>
> > Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
> >
> > > Obviously, a library is not enough for a heterogeneous system, or
> > > am I missing anything from your description? As I know, e.g. there is
> > > no device-ind
On Feb 3, 2009, at 8:48 AM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
Obviously, a library is not enough for a heterogeneous system, or
am I missing anything from your description? As I know, e.g. there
is
no device-independent bytecode in the OpenCL standard which such a
backend cou
> I am always a very careful with the 32-bit Sparc build because I often end
> up with a 32-bit gcc but the ABI says SPARC V8PLUS or some such.
On Solaris. Things are quite different on Linux and other OSes.
> # /opt/build/GCC/gcc-4.3.3-build/prev-gcc/xgcc -v
> Using built-in specs.
> Target: sp
Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
> Obviously, a library is not enough for a heterogeneous system, or
> am I missing anything from your description? As I know, e.g. there is
> no device-independent bytecode in the OpenCL standard which such a
> backend could generate.
That's correct. I was envisioning
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 11:44 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We like to update x86-64 psABI to pass aggregates of 32 bytes with
> single __m256 field
> in AVX registers, instead of memory. However, finding the proper
> wording seems tricky.
> Here is what I got. Any comments?
>
Here is the revised
>> > I'll try sparc64, powerpc64 and ia64 when the machines are available.
>>
>> I can probably help you with the Sparc64 requirement. To be precise, do
>> you need Sun UltraSparc or are you looking for the multicore SPARC64
>> processor which is a ( slightly ) different beast?
>
> Thanks for your
rkarthi2k5 wrote:
> Hi Sir/Mam,
Do not post this to the gcc list, which is for the development of gcc.
I answered your question on the gcc-help list.
Andrew.
Hi Sir/Mam,
I installed the gcc and other softwares wlth .tar extension. We
have to do a step by step procedure while installing the sofware which have
.tar extension.
1) First, we have to unzip the file and give ./configure
2) Second, we have to give ma
Hello,
We at ISP RAS have plans to work in the near future on generating either
CUDA source or PTX from C programs (probably with simple OpenMP
directives). Of course, we would benefit from the OpenCL infrastructure
in GCC if one was available.
Mark Mitchell wrote:
We (CodeSourcery) have
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 10:52 -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 12:15 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >> The GNU Compiler Collection version 4.3.3 has been released.
> >>
> >> GCC 4.3.3 is a bug-fix release containing fixes for regressions and
> >> serious bugs in GCC 4.3.2. Thi
> On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 12:15 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> The GNU Compiler Collection version 4.3.3 has been released.
>>
>> GCC 4.3.3 is a bug-fix release containing fixes for regressions and
>> serious bugs in GCC 4.3.2. This release is available from the
>> FTP servers listed at:
>>
>>
Hi, Im sorry that this is not 100% specific to gcc, however this
mailing list is the last place where I think this knowledge may lie. I
have written some image processing routines in assembly language
making extensive use of MMX, and now I want to start optimizing it,
however I cant for the life of
On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 12:15 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> The GNU Compiler Collection version 4.3.3 has been released.
>
> GCC 4.3.3 is a bug-fix release containing fixes for regressions and
> serious bugs in GCC 4.3.2. This release is available from the
> FTP servers listed at:
>
> http://
"Brian O'Mahoney" writes:
> Two quick questions:
This message might have been better sent to gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org.
Please consider taking any followups there. Thanks.
> (1) Is the feature roadmap for 4.5, 4.6 ... published anywhere
No. We're not that formal. Likely major features are LTO,
raja.sal...@iap-online.com writes:
>>> Is there a way to make the instruction has to allocate to run without
>>> using the scheduler for particular instruction ?
>>
>> I don't understand the question.
>
> The target we are using supports parallel instruction execution, Max 7.
> For one cycle, one
37 matches
Mail list logo
