Re: GCC ssa and alias info

On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Rogelio M. Serrano Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can this dump then be used to generate a running excutable? No. The output is not valid C, but a pretty printed version of GCC's internal representation. Diego.

Re: GCC ssa and alias info

Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: Check options -fdump-tree-* in the GCC documentation. Cheers, Manuel. Can this dump then be used to generate a running excutable? On 12/02/2008, Dasarath Weeratunge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is it possible to dump the ssa representation and alias informati

Re: GCC ssa and alias info

2008/2/12 Dasarath Weeratunge <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >: > Is it possible to dump the ssa representation and alias information > generated by the compiler to a file? Yes. If you are using 4.3+, alias analysis is a TODO item, so it's run if a pass requests it. If you use -f

Re: Is anyone testing for a (cross-) target (board) with dynlinking?

> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:29:39 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 07:20:52PM +0100, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:16:27 -0500 > > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Just for completeness: -rpath is > >

Re: ICE in delete_output_reload

Ian Lance Taylor wrote: Michael Eager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I patched the code to only count the occurrence if the locations are different. Any idea if that has adverse consequences? I would expect that to work. But before bringing it back to mainline I'd like to find out why the loca

Re: ICE in delete_output_reload

Michael Eager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I patched the code to only count the occurrence if the > locations are different. Any idea if that has adverse > consequences? I would expect that to work. But before bringing it back to mainline I'd like to find out why the locations are the same. >

Re: ICE in delete_output_reload

Ian Lance Taylor wrote: Michael Eager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I'm trying to understand an assertion failure in reload1.c:8135. In delete_output_reload(), I'm getting an assertion failure in this code: for (i1 = reg_equiv_alt_mem_list [REGNO (reg)]; i1; i1 = XEXP (i1, 1)) {

Re: ICE in delete_output_reload

Michael Eager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm trying to understand an assertion failure in reload1.c:8135. > > In delete_output_reload(), I'm getting an assertion failure > in this code: > >for (i1 = reg_equiv_alt_mem_list [REGNO (reg)]; i1; i1 = XEXP (i1, 1)) > { >gcc_assert

Re: Is anyone testing for a (cross-) target (board) with dynlinking?

Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes, I was slightly mistaken. The manual says "Searching -rpath in > this way is only supported by native linkers and cross linkers which > have been configured with the --with-sysroot option." > > I don't remember why that exception is there. Bec

ICE in delete_output_reload

I'm trying to understand an assertion failure in reload1.c:8135. In delete_output_reload(), I'm getting an assertion failure in this code: for (i1 = reg_equiv_alt_mem_list [REGNO (reg)]; i1; i1 = XEXP (i1, 1)) { gcc_assert (!rtx_equal_p (XEXP (i1, 0), substed)); n_occurrences +

Re: Is anyone testing for a (cross-) target (board) with dynlinking?

> From: Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 12 Feb 2008 07:48:51 -0800 Thanks to all. I no longer think there's anything that needs fixing in the gcc testsuite regarding copying of libraries or in particular libgcc_s.so.1; I just need my baseboard-file to copy over every *.so* from ld_li

Re: LLVM 2.2

> One of the big changes is that we now recommend the GCC 4.2-based > front-end, Another is that it supports Ada (32 bit x86 on linux only for the moment) and Fortran to some extent. I'm currently adding build instructions for these two languages to http://llvm.org/docs/CFEBuildInstrs.html (sho

Re: Is anyone testing for a (cross-) target (board) with dynlinking?

On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 07:20:52PM +0100, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:16:27 -0500 > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 05:13:45AM +0100, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > > Thanks to you and David Daney. Have you used it yourself? >

Re: GCC ssa and alias info

Check options -fdump-tree-* in the GCC documentation. Cheers, Manuel. On 12/02/2008, Dasarath Weeratunge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it possible to dump the ssa representation and alias information > generated by the compiler to a file? > > thanks, > -- dasarath >

Re: Is anyone testing for a (cross-) target (board) with dynlinking?

> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:16:27 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 05:13:45AM +0100, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > Thanks to you and David Daney. Have you used it yourself? > > Apparently tricks are needed as the -rpath is used both at > > run-time and

Re: Is anyone testing for a (cross-) target (board) with dynlinking?

On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 05:13:45AM +0100, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > Thanks to you and David Daney. Have you used it yourself? > Apparently tricks are needed as the -rpath is used both at > run-time and at link-time, ld complains about "No such file or > directory" if the path doesn't exist on th

GCC ssa and alias info

Is it possible to dump the ssa representation and alias information generated by the compiler to a file? thanks, -- dasarath

LLVM 2.2

Hi all, For anyone who is interested, we just released LLVM 2.2 with numerous enhancements: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-announce/2008-February/25.html http://llvm.org/releases/2.2/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#whatsnew One of the big changes is that we now recommend the GCC 4.2-based

Re: Is anyone testing for a (cross-) target (board) with dynlinking?

Hans-Peter Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Apparently tricks are needed as the -rpath is used both at > run-time and at link-time, ld complains about "No such file or > directory" if the path doesn't exist on the host side. -rpath-link is your friend here. In the past I've just manually co

This company is being noticed

We first brought PERT to you back in OCT when it was at only .03 This stock is at a low, and the best buy in stage ever! With US Navy testing going great, prices have dropped in anticipation of news. With the news of the US Navy's intrest. Many others are taking notice and making inquires to t

Re: Is anyone testing for a (cross-) target (board) with dynlinking?

On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 05:13:45AM +0100, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > From: Nathan Froyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > One way to do it is with NFS mounts and setting -Wl,-dynamic-linker > > -Wl,-rpath for your ldflags. > > Thanks to you and David Daney. Have you used it yourself? > Apparently tricks