Michael Eager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I patched the code to only count the occurrence if the > locations are different. Any idea if that has adverse > consequences?
I would expect that to work. But before bringing it back to mainline I'd like to find out why the locations are the same. > > In case it helps, this is where reg_equiv_alt_mem came in: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-07/msg01136.html > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00070.html > > Thanks. I think I saw one or perhaps both. I'll look again. > > Has anyone ever done a description of reg allocation or reload? Just http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/reload , I think. Ian
