Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-11-04)

On Nov 5, 2007, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Are there any unreviewed patches that I could help to review? Also, how about the patch for PR27898? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-07/msg00187.html -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ FSF Latin A

Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-11-04)

On Nov 5, 2007, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Does anyone object to turning on mapped locations by default? Not at all. > * Are there any unreviewed patches that I could help to review? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg00608.html Without this patch, -g changes the g

GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-11-04)

Questions = * Does anyone object to turning on mapped locations by default? * Are there any unreviewed patches that I could help to review? Quality Data We're still in Stage 3 for GCC 4.3. As discussed on the GCC mailing list, once we reach 100 open regressions, we'll ent

Re: undocumented optimization options

Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Janis Johnson wrote: >> -fipa-cp steven >> -fipa-matrix-reorg razya >> -fipa-pure-const zadeck (enabled with -O) >> -fipa-referencezadeck (enabled with -O) >> -fipa-type-escape zadeck >> -fvar-tracking-un

Re: Tree-SSA and POST_INC address mode inompatible in GCC4?

Kenneth Zadeck wrote: > To fix this will require a round of copy propagation, most likely in > concert with some induction variable detection, since the most > profitable place for this will be in loops. For code size, it will be profitable everywhere. On ARM, aggressive use of post-increment

Re: [wwwdocs] PATCH Re: Optimization of conditional access to globals: thread-unsafe?

On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 02:04:21PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Andreas Schwab wrote: > >> I don't have access to the POSIX standard itself > > See . > > Now added to our "Links and Selected Readings" page; thanks for th

The Linux binutils 2.18.50.0.3 is released

This is the beta release of binutils 2.18.50.0.3 for Linux, which is based on binutils 2007 1102 in CVS on sourceware.org plus various changes. It is purely for Linux. All relevant patches in patches have been applied to the source tree. You can take a look at patches/README to see what have been

strict aliasing

Can someone tell me what optimisations might be enabled/disabled by strict aliasing rules? Is there some merit in a switch which allows coarse aliasing optimisations, that is, allows optimisations based on integer vs float vs pointer, but not on pointer vs pointer? I have some code which makes al

[wwwdocs] PATCH Re: Optimization of conditional access to globals: thread-unsafe?

On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> I don't have access to the POSIX standard itself > See . Now added to our "Links and Selected Readings" page; thanks for the pointer, Andreas! Gerald Index: readings.html

Why is this still not allowed by gcc while MSVC does(const template argument)

Please check the following small program: (NOTE: {code} and {noformat} below are just Confluence Wiki markup, you can ignore them when reading.) {code} #include template class CEnsureCleanup_array { int m_ArraySize; USER_TYPE *m_ar; // This member representing the object array