On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 05:42:58PM -0700, Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培) wrote:
> On 10/19/07, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: "Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:25:14 -0700
> >
> > > If you're not in a hurry, can you wait
> > > till I run the r
On 10/19/07, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:25:14 -0700
>
> > If you're not in a hurry, can you wait
> > till I run the regtest against 4.2 on x86-64 ?
> > I've already discussed the patch with Kenny
> > and
From: "Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:25:14 -0700
> If you're not in a hurry, can you wait
> till I run the regtest against 4.2 on x86-64 ?
> I've already discussed the patch with Kenny
> and we agreed that this is the right approach,
> but I'd like to see
On 10/19/07, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 22:56:49 -0700
>
> > Did you replace the DF_REF_REG_USE with DEF ?
> > If so, that's not correct. We need to add DEF as well as USE:
> ...
> > Then, we'll need to c
From: "Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 22:56:49 -0700
> Did you replace the DF_REF_REG_USE with DEF ?
> If so, that's not correct. We need to add DEF as well as USE:
...
> Then, we'll need to change the df_invalidated_by_call loop
> not to add global_regs[] a
Snapshot gcc-4.3-20071019 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20071019/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
> The two files in question do compile at -O0 so you wouldn't
> trip it.
You misunderstood, only the compiler is built at -O0 -g, the runtime is built
normally at -O2 -g.
--
Eric Botcazou
Eric Botcazou wrote:
I would appreciate it is one of the SPARC/Solaris
users would see if they can duplicate this.
I cannot duplicate on SPARC/Solaris, but my tree is not pristine.
This is for a --disable--bootstrap compiler built at -O0 -g.
The two files in question do compile at -O0
> I would appreciate it is one of the SPARC/Solaris
> users would see if they can duplicate this.
I cannot duplicate on SPARC/Solaris, but my tree is not pristine.
This is for a --disable--bootstrap compiler built at -O0 -g.
--
Eric Botcazou
Hi,
When compiling GNAT/RTEMS to SPARC on the SVN trunk,
the compilation of g-catiio.adb and g-spipat.adb
hang when using -O2. I kill the compilation and
do them by hand with -O0 and the build continues.
I would appreciate it is one of the SPARC/Solaris
users would see if they can duplicate thi
* Christophe Meudec:
> So how can the body of system.soft_links be elaborated prior to the
> body of ada.exceptions since it is dependent on it?
The standard library is not subject to the elaboration rules of the
language. It's not written in standard Ada, either.
2007-10-18 Benjamin Kosnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Removal of pre-ISO C++ items from include/backwards.
* include/Makefile.am (backward_headers): Remove all but
strstream,
backward_warning.h.
* include/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* include/backward/new.h: Remov
Just an old newbie question.
when I look at the elaboration order generated by gnatbind for the
standard libraries I get the following:
...
system.soft_links (spec)
system.soft_links (body)
...
ada.exceptions (body)
...
but the body of soft_links contains
Ada.Exceptions.Save_Occ
13 matches
Mail list logo
