From: "Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:25:14 -0700
> If you're not in a hurry, can you wait > till I run the regtest against 4.2 on x86-64 ? > I've already discussed the patch with Kenny > and we agreed that this is the right approach, > but I'd like to see the clean regtest on x86 for both 4.2 and 4.3 > before I approve. > Thanks, I am in no rush, please let me know if you want some help tracking down the failure you are seeing. Since you say it is a libgomp failure... I wonder if some of the atomic primitives need some side effect markings which are missing and thus exposed by not clobbering global regs at call sites any more.
