On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> The tester where this problem first surfaced as a 32-bit Athlon machine,
> with 512MB main memory and 1GB swap. The machine runs FreeBSD 5.4.
>
> I agree with your intuition that even if the machines is swapping heavily,
> this amount of virtual memory
>
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > Can you tell us a bit more about the config? It really shouldn't be
> > failing to compile this program.
>
> The tester where this problem first surfaced as a 32-bit Athlon machine,
> with 512MB main memory and 1GB swap. The machine runs FreeBSD
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Can you tell us a bit more about the config? It really shouldn't be
> failing to compile this program.
The tester where this problem first surfaced as a 32-bit Athlon machine,
with 512MB main memory and 1GB swap. The machine runs FreeBSD 5.4.
I agree w
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:10:52AM +0100, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> Sorry for this off-topic message, but I have some troubles registering on
> https://www.gccsummit.org/2007/login.php and my email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounced.
>
> My own email is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Do
> "Marco" == Marco Trudel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marco> If it takes about 30 to 40min to build this html/parser.o and
Marco> gnu-xml.o needs about 1 or 2 minutes but is - last time I took a look
Marco> - a lot bigger than the html parser, shouldn't then be investigated
Marco> why this htm
Andrew Haley wrote:
David Daney writes:
> Tom Tromey wrote:
> >> "David" == David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > David> The call to _ZN4java4lang6ObjectC1Ev is being generated as non-pic,
> > David> even though that symbol is defined in libgcj.so. The assembler and
> > Dav
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 08:03:36AM +0100, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> (I don't know if the good mailing list for this is gcc@ or gcc-patches@)
>
> Apparently trunk rev 121458 don't bootstrap on linux debian sid amd64 ie
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
>
> I'm getting
>
> make[4]
On 2/1/07, Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 11:26:38 Ismail Dönmez wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 January 2007 18:43:52 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I am getting this when I try to compile gcc trunk:
> > >
> > > ../../lib
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 11:26:38 Ismail Dönmez wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 January 2007 18:43:52 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I am getting this when I try to compile gcc trunk:
> > >
> > > ../../libcpp/../include -I../../libcpp/include -march=i686 -O2
On 2/1/07, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paulo J. Matos wrote on 02/01/07 04:37:
> What can I do then to stop gcc to further process things? After
> informing the user there's no more reason on my site to continue.
>
Stop gracefully or just stop? The latter is easy. The former invol
Paulo J. Matos wrote on 02/01/07 04:37:
What can I do then to stop gcc to further process things? After
informing the user there's no more reason on my site to continue.
Stop gracefully or just stop? The latter is easy. The former involves
writing code to skip all passes after a certain poin
Hello All,
Sorry for this off-topic message, but I have some troubles registering on
https://www.gccsummit.org/2007/login.php and my email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bounced.
My own email is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone know who should I contact about the gccsummit.org web site or
registration syste
David Daney writes:
> Tom Tromey wrote:
> >> "David" == David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > David> The call to _ZN4java4lang6ObjectC1Ev is being generated as non-pic,
> > David> even though that symbol is defined in libgcj.so. The assembler and
> > David> linker conspire to
On 2/1/07, Pranav Bhandarkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, the internals only warn against using INSN_CODE on use,
clobber, asm_input, addr_vec, addr_diff_vec. There is no mention of
other members of the other members of RTX_EXTRA. or shouldnt
recog_memoized have an INSN_P check in it ?
Am
Hi All,
I am using recog_memoized in the machine dependent reorg pass.
However, It is causing an ICE because unwittingly a CODE_LABEL is
getting passed to it.
I understand that CODE_LABEL is in the RTX_EXTRA class and intuitively
It is wrong to use INSN_CODE ( which is used in recog_memoized) on
On 1/31/07, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paulo J. Matos wrote on 01/31/07 11:26:
> So, ideally, I would like just the gcc part until the first part of
> the middleend where you have a 'no optimizations', language
> independent AST of the source file.
>
OK, so you probably want to inj
I forgot to send to the mailing list that the --disable-multilib from
Andrew worked. Thank you all.
:)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Paulo J. Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jan 31, 2007 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: Compiling GCC
To: Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 1/31/07, Andrew
Tom Tromey wrote:
"Benjamin" == Benjamin Kosnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Benjamin> but I am
Benjamin> somewhat concerned with the response of the java maintainers (and
Benjamin> others) that it's OK to require >512MB to bootstrap gcc with java, or
Benjamin> that make times "WORKSFORME."
My
18 matches
Mail list logo
