Krishna Myneni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Under "gcc (GCC) 4.1.0 (SUSE Linux)", with CFLAGS = -m32 -S, and under all of
the optimization levels (O0 through O3), the following is produced :
flds .LC2
fldz
fxch %st(1)
fucompp
fnstsw %ax
:
The FXCH instruction is unnecessary if the FLDS and FLDZ
int test (void)
{
double f;
int j = (f > 0.);
return j;
}
Under "gcc (GCC) 4.1.0 (SUSE Linux)", with CFLAGS = -m32 -S, and under
all of the optimization levels (O0 through O3), the following is
produced :
flds.LC2
fldz
fxch%st(1)
On 10/17/06, Revital1 Eres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Is there an option to change the name of the .gcno file that is generated
by using profiling
flags like -fprofile-generate and later used by -fprofile-use?
I read that "For each source file compiled with `-fprofile-arcs', an
accompany
Hi Revital
> Is there an option to change the name of the .gcno file that is
> generated by using profiling flags like -fprofile-generate and later
> used by -fprofile-use? I read that "For each source file compiled
> with `-fprofile-arcs', an accompanying `.gcda' file will be placed
> in the obj
> Is documenting the passes on the Wiki worthwile? Could some people
> document (in a few sentences) each pass (ie each struct
> tree_opt_pass defined in the source tree) if possible?
Perhaps once your assignment is processed, you could transfer all of
the new material from the Wiki into the inter
On Oct 18, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
I need to check for a non-0 return value in dg-compile testcases in
gcc.
I'd not worry about it in general. The exit status should be properly
checked for every other compile line and it should be ok.
Brendon Costa wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> How can I find a FUNCTION_DECL node from a CALL_EXPR node for virtual
> function calls?
>
Well I have managed to achieve this, though I don't know if it is the
best way to do so. For the sake of people that may find this question in
the list archives I will sho
Hi,
I need to check for a non-0 return value in dg-compile testcases in
gcc.
A simple testcase from richi shows the problem i'm facing:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr29254.c?view=markup&pathrev=117577
In this testcase, he checks for
/* { dg-warning "warnings being treate
Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IMA for C++ is another difficult case. This is unambiguously useful,
> though duplicative of what we're trying to build with LTO.
Although there are some things you can do with LTO that you can also
do with IMA, there are many things that you can do wi
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 10:02 +0200, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
> Looking at rs6000.opt I have found that the above command line switch
> variable is defined TWICE:
>
> msched-prolog
> Target Report Var(TARGET_SCHED_PROLOG) Init(1)
> Schedule the start and end of the procedure
>
> msched-epilog
> Targ
Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
The configury bit was approved by DJ for stage1, but do you see any reason
to hold back? Or is this posting sufficient warning that people may need
to upgrade? (I.e. people should start upgrading their libraries now.)
I don't see any reason to hold back.
Thanks,
--
M
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> As Gerald noticed, there are now fewer than 100 serious regressions open
> against mainline, which means that we've met the criteria for creating
> the 4.2 release branch. (We still have 17 P1s, so we've certainly got
> some work left to do before creat
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> >
> > > Okay for stage1?
> >
> > Ok, assuming everyone agrees to those versions ;-)
>
> Great, thanks. I haven't heard anyone disagree with those versions, so
> unless someone objects before stage1 starts I'll
Ian Lance Taylor writes:
> gcc permits '$' as an implementation defined character. It does this
> mainly for historical reasons.
We also need it to link C++ programs with programs written in the Java
language. That's because in Java, classes have synthetic fields whose
names contain '$' chraca
> trevor smigiel writes:
trevor> We, Sony Computer Entertainment, would like to contribute a port for a
trevor> new target, the Cell SPU, and seek acceptance from the Steering
trevor> Committee to do so.
The GCC Steering Committee welcomes the contribution of the Cell
SPU port from So
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 07:07:00PM +0200, Frank Riese wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following problem with a back end I've written after the following
> changes in the machine header, to tell GCC that the machine is word-addressed
> with a word width of 16 Bit:
>
> #define BITS_PER_UNIT
On 2006-10-18, at 12:15, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On 10/18/06, Marcin Dalecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looking at rs6000.opt I have found that the above command line switch
variable is defined TWICE:
msched-prolog
Target Report Var(TARGET_SCHED_PROLOG) Init(1)
Schedule the start and end of th
Brian Dessent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Consider posting this kind of question to gcc-help@ instead.
OK, I will.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I just ran these commands:
> >
> > svn -q checkout svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk gcc
> > mkdir builddir
> > cd builddir
> > CFLAGS="-
Marcin Dalecki wrote on 10/18/06 00:27:
bsi_insert_after (&si, t, TSI_SAME_STMT);
Shouldn't this bee
bsi_insert_after (&si, t, BSI_SAME_STMT);
instead?
Yes. We lucked out because both symbols have the same numeric value.
Patch pre-approved as obvious.
PS: Please do not use existin
On 10/18/06, Marcin Dalecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looking at rs6000.opt I have found that the above command line switch
variable is defined TWICE:
msched-prolog
Target Report Var(TARGET_SCHED_PROLOG) Init(1)
Schedule the start and end of the procedure
msched-epilog
Target Undocumented Var(
Marcin Dalecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Looking at the function expand_omp_parallel in omp-low.c I have found
| the following line of code:
|
|bsi_insert_after (&si, t, TSI_SAME_STMT);
|
| Shouldn't this bee
|
|bsi_insert_after (&si, t, BSI_SAME_STMT);
|
| instead?
The TSI_* and
Looking at rs6000.opt I have found that the above command line switch
variable is defined TWICE:
msched-prolog
Target Report Var(TARGET_SCHED_PROLOG) Init(1)
Schedule the start and end of the procedure
msched-epilog
Target Undocumented Var(TARGET_SCHED_PROLOG) VarExists
This appears of course
22 matches
Mail list logo
