Marcin Dalecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Looking at the function expand_omp_parallel in omp-low.c I have found | the following line of code: | | bsi_insert_after (&si, t, TSI_SAME_STMT); | | Shouldn't this bee | | bsi_insert_after (&si, t, BSI_SAME_STMT); | | instead?
The TSI_* and BSI_* enumerators are supposed to have the same numerical values. However, either TSI_* or BSI_* should just go away. From typing perspective, as Marcin points out, the above is meaningless. (Yes, I know, C does not care; but closely related languages do). -- Gaby
