Re: Can't build gcc trunk (revision 112779) on sparc-linux: configure: error: jar program not found

On 4/10/06, David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Correct. It was removed on the trunk after gcc-4.1 branched. Since it > appears to in /usr/bin, make sure that is in the path when > configuring/building the trunk. right, I'm bubblestrapping right now after having installed the libgcj packag

Re: Can't build gcc trunk (revision 112779) on sparc-linux: configure: error: jar program not found

Christian Joensson wrote: On 4/10/06, David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: fastjar was removed from gcc. You now need either a working jar program or to disable java when building. uhm, well... $ rpmquery -f /usr/bin/fastjar libgcj-4.1.0-0.23 so I suppose at least for me, fatsjar is st

Re: Can't build gcc trunk (revision 112779) on sparc-linux: configure: error: jar program not found

On 4/10/06, David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > fastjar was removed from gcc. You now need either a working jar program > or to disable java when building. uhm, well... $ rpmquery -f /usr/bin/fastjar libgcj-4.1.0-0.23 so I suppose at least for me, fatsjar is still in gcc-4.1.0... -- Chee

Re: Can't build gcc trunk (revision 112779) on sparc-linux: configure: error: jar program not found

Christian Joensson wrote: On 4/10/06, Christian Joensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: checking for jar... no checking for fastjar... no configure: error: jar program not found make[1]: *** [configure-target-libjava] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32' make: *** [bo

Re: Can't build gcc trunk (revision 112779) on sparc-linux: configure: error: jar program not found

On 4/10/06, Christian Joensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > checking for jar... no > checking for fastjar... no > configure: error: jar program not found > make[1]: *** [configure-target-libjava] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32' > make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2 >

Can't build gcc trunk (revision 112779) on sparc-linux: configure: error: jar program not found

Aurora SPARC Linux release 2.0b2+corona UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) sun4u: binutils-2.16.91.0.3-2.sparc bison-2.1-1.1.sparc dejagnu-1.4.4-2.noarch expect-5.43.0-2.1.sparc gcc-4.1.0-0.23.sparc package gcc4 is not installed glibc-2.3.90-39.sparcv9 glibc-devel-2.3.90-39.sparc glibc-headers-2.3.90-39.sparc

Re: GCC Port (gcc backend) for Microchip PICMicro microcontroller

François Poulain wrote: If I'm right, here are copyright assignments to FSF for the Microchip's contributions for GCC. Unfortunately, this is not good enough. A copyright assignment is a formal contract that must be physically signed and sent to the FSF. See

Re: Repository Write Access: A privilege or a right?

> Getting copyright approval is painful enough without putting even more > hurdles in a new contributor's way. Anything we do to make the > process of becoming a gcc maintainer even less inviting than it is at > the moment is a Bad Thing. > > Once someone has contributed a decent patch or t

Re: GCC Port (gcc backend) for Microchip PICMicro microcontroller

If I'm right, here are copyright assignments to FSF for the Microchip's contributions for GCC. Best regards, Francois Poulain [EMAIL PROTECTED]/David/Install/gcc-3.3_with_PIC30_support/gcc-3.3/gcc/config/pic30 $ head pic30.* ==> pic30.c <== /* Subroutines for insn output for Microchip dsPIC30

Re: Repository Write Access: A privilege or a right?

On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 07:16:42PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > There's also the new/recent complication that companies/groups now > > maintain their own GCC branches, perhaps requiring write access even > > for programmers who don't contribute to FSF GCC. > > It is my understanding that we do

Re: Repository Write Access: A privilege or a right?

Roger Sayle writes: > > Increasingly, there have been examples of patches getting checked-in > without maintainer approval, or without posting to gcc-patches, etc... Are you absolutely sure that's true? i.e., do you believe that these days there is a greater _proportion_ of unapproved patches

Re: Repository Write Access: A privilege or a right?

On Sun, 9 Apr 2006, Roger Sayle wrote: > My understanding (which is admittedly mostly personal and historical) > is that someone is granted write access once they have demonstrated > an understanding of the rules and policies for submissions to GCC. This is my understanding as well. > There does

Repository Write Access: A privilege or a right?

I've a quick question regarding the policy for granting/sponsoring CVS/subversion write access. There seems to have been a recent change in thinking (or difference of opinions) on the pre-requisites for allowing a new contributor modification rights to GCC's source repository. My understanding (

Re: [Ada] Can't build revision 112801 of gcc trunk on cygwin: ada/env.c:312: undefined reference to `_clearenv'

On 4/9/06, Arnaud Charlet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ../../gcc/gcc/ada/env.c: In function `__gnat_clearenv': > > ../../gcc/gcc/ada/env.c:312: warning: implicit declaration of function > > `clearenv' > It likely means that clearenv is not available in cygwin and you need > to add proper #ifdef

Re: GCC Port (gcc backend) for Microchip PICMicro microcontroller

François Poulain wrote: I think so. Microchip have done a modified version of GCC-3.3 with DSPICs support, so we have got a heavy good base to work on the instruction set, wich is similar for PIC18. DSPIC is a 16 bit CPU, so is memory isn't segmented. Just as a reminder, even though the Microc

Re: [Ada] Can't build revision 112801 of gcc trunk on cygwin: ada/env.c:312: undefined reference to `_clearenv'

> gcc -c -g -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes > -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Iada > -I../../gcc/gcc -I../../gcc/gcc/ada -I../../gcc/gcc/../include > -I../../gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include -I../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber > -I../libdecnumber../..

Re: Update of mirrors web page

On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote: >> That means they mirror from ftp.gnu.org, rather than gcc.gnu.org. > Right, but should they all be in the same listing? You're right, they shouldn't. I believe I know removed all such mirrors, which really do not mirror gcc.gnu.org but ftp.gnu.org tha

[Ada] Can't build revision 112801 of gcc trunk on cygwin: ada/env.c:312: undefined reference to `_clearenv'

Windows XP Pro/SP2 cygwin Pentium M processor 2.13GHz system with packages: binutils 20050610-1 2.16.91 20050610 bison2.1-1 2.1 cygwin 1.5.19-4 dejagnu 20021217-2 1.4.2.x expect 20030128-1 5.26 gcc