On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> > > * Maybe it would be possible to perform further development on a vendor
> > > branch in the GCC svn repository? I'm not sure if this would require SC
> > > buy-in, though. Perhaps the changes might become acceptible for FSF GCC
> > > at some
Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The new pex-win32.c code doesn't operate correctly when used for
> MinGW-hosted tools invoked from a Cygwin window. In particular, process
> creation ("gcc" invoking "as", say) results in a DOS console window
> popping up. When invoked from a DOS windo
> > * Maybe it would be possible to perform further development on a vendor
> > branch in the GCC svn repository? I'm not sure if this would require SC
> > buy-in, though. Perhaps the changes might become acceptible for FSF GCC
> > at some point in time; there have been discussions over at
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Alexey Starovoytov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > We are pleased to announce the availability of GCC for SPARC (R) Systems
> > (GCCfss) at http://cooltools.sunsource.net/gcc/
> >
> > GCCfss extends GCC to be able to use
> > the optimizing Sun(tm) Code Ge
Is there a function like prev_nonnote_insn that, when it encounters a
label preceeded by a barrier, attempts to determine if there's a
single jump to that branch and returns it if so?
Ian --
The new pex-win32.c code doesn't operate correctly when used for
MinGW-hosted tools invoked from a Cygwin window. In particular, process
creation ("gcc" invoking "as", say) results in a DOS console window
popping up. When invoked from a DOS window, things are fine.
The reason for this pr
I am working on a port with gcc-4.0.2, and I've been getting a
segmentation fault when call_used_regs[] is referenced with a pseudo
register in fixup_match_2() in regmove.c.
if (call_used_regs[REGNO(dst)])
|| find_reg_fusage (p, CLOBBER, dst))
break;
...
}
regmove_op
Snapshot gcc-4.0-20060309 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.0-20060309/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.0 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Alexey Starovoytov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We are pleased to announce the availability of GCC for SPARC (R) Systems
> (GCCfss) at http://cooltools.sunsource.net/gcc/
>
> GCCfss extends GCC to be able to use
> the optimizing Sun(tm) Code Generator for SPARC systems (SCGfss).
A couple of que
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> It is a bit weird that objcp is included in the gcc-core download. It
>> could be included in the gcc-objc download (or in a separate objcp
>> download). But
> It should go in an objcp download. sourcebuild.texi includes updating
> the release scr
On Thursday 09 March 2006 18:04, Alan Lehotsky wrote:
> I've built a generic 4.1.0 for RH7.3 x86 linux (I did a make bootstrap)
>
> Compiling a rather large file, I get
>
> tmp.f_00.cxx:26432: error: unrecognizable insn:
> (insn 173 172 174 9 (set (reg:QI 122)
> (const_int 128 [0x80]))
Hi,
Can someone tell me what do unql,high,low refer to in the dump generated by
gcc using -fdump-tree-original-raw.
@10 integer_type name: @20 unql: @21 size: @22
algn: 64 prec: 36 unsigned
min : @23 max : @24
I've built a generic 4.1.0 for RH7.3 x86 linux (I did a make bootstrap)
Compiling a rather large file, I get
tmp.f_00.cxx:26432: error: unrecognizable insn:
(insn 173 172 174 9 (set (reg:QI 122)
(const_int 128 [0x80])) -1 (nil)
(nil))
tmp.f_00.cxx:26432: internal compiler err
On 3/9/06, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Profile information isn't always available.
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 06:26:27PM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> But branch predictions are, and those are still far more reliable than loop
> notes. The predictions use natural loop discovery and the
On 3/9/06, Lalit Gidwani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have C/C++/Java programming skills. I have also
> studied a couple of books on compiler development. I
> would like to start with a project that will provide
> me with the experience of having participated in a
> real compiler development effo
> > I see that flow no longer uses loop_depth when computing REG_N_REFS,
> >
> > That strikes me as wrong. Don't we want to give pseudos that are in loops
> > preference over those that aren't?
>
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 09:12:35AM +0100, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
> we have much more reliable he
Jeffrey A Law wrote:
Presumably there's a reason why enumeral types don't have a
base type?
They don't in Ada (since there is no issue at the Ada semantic
level of out of range intermediate values), but we could certainly
introduce such a notion at the implementation level if it helps.
I've
I have C/C++/Java programming skills. I have also
studied a couple of books on compiler development. I
would like to start with a project that will provide
me with the experience of having participated in a
real compiler development effort. I am interested in
C/C++/Java.
Can you tell me which modu
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 15:05 -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> I notice in your PDF, you have:
> Since alias analysis results are often conservative, may-alias sets my
> contain tens
> and enve hundreds of symbols.
>
> Is there a reason why not tune the aliasing anaysis to return more liberal
> resul
Dave Korn wrote:
On 09 March 2006 13:11, Jean-Yves Bitterlich wrote:
Jean, do you know you're replying to an email from October 2005? Ah well, I
see the thread ended without all the information coming out, Andreas said it
was impossible but didn't go into the details so it's worth mentionin
On 09 March 2006 13:11, Jean-Yves Bitterlich wrote:
Jean, do you know you're replying to an email from October 2005? Ah well, I
see the thread ended without all the information coming out, Andreas said it
was impossible but didn't go into the details so it's worth mentioning the
builtins.
>> K
> Kalaky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'am looking for some way to pass variable arguments to another
> > function that receives variable arguments without using va_list.
>
> This is impossible.
what about?
#define DOTS ...
function_1 (int z, ...);
function_2 (int z, ...);
{
return fun
Kalaky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'am looking for some way to pass variable arguments to another
> function that receives variable arguments without using va_list.
This is impossible.
what about?
#define DOTS ...
function_1 (int z, ...);
function_2 (int z, ...);
{
return function_1
Hi,
Can someone tell me what do unql,high,low refer to in the dump generated by
gcc using -fdump-tree-original-raw.
@10 integer_type name: @20 unql: @21 size: @22
algn: 64 prec: 36 unsigned
min : @23 max : @24
Thank you. Now it compiled and i built my first testfile. I only extracted
the mingw-runtime and
w32api into the --prefix directory.
bye
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Successful-Build%3A-gcc-4.1-20051230-i686-pc-mingw32-t834182.html#a3317635
Sent from the gcc - Dev forum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I compiled gcc 3.4.5 on an i386 pc under Solaris 10 with posix threads.
> When I try to compile certain downloaded tarballs (especially those that
> use the gtk+ libs) gcc passes "-mt" to cc1, which chokes with an "illegal
> option error" message. The gcc docs say that
Hello,
> I see that flow no longer uses loop_depth when computing REG_N_REFS,
>
> That strikes me as wrong. Don't we want to give pseudos that are in loops
> preference over those that aren't?
we have much more reliable heuristic based on profile information for some time
now.
Zdenek
27 matches
Mail list logo
