Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
I have one question about EH_USES on the ia-64 (the only place it is
used).
I know this is a bit late, but I didn't see any answer to this on this
list, and figured you might still need one.
The IA-64 port uses EH_USES for registers that hold frame state. We can
opti
Geoffrey Keating wrote:
> Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>However, the PowerPC GNU/Linux community seems to want this feature very
>>badly, and has suggested that failure to incorporate these patches in
>>GCC 4.1 would be very bad. My feeling is that it is the PowerPC
>>community
Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, the PowerPC GNU/Linux community seems to want this feature very
> badly, and has suggested that failure to incorporate these patches in
> GCC 4.1 would be very bad. My feeling is that it is the PowerPC
> community which will be harmed if they g
Andrew Pinski wrote:
> var_can_have_subvars (tree v)
> {
> +
> + /* Volatile variables should never have subvars. */
>
No vertical space here.
>
> On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 12:28 -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > >
> > > I've build in a unified (symlink) tree, with sourceware stuff checked
> > > out via cvs from date/time D2006.02.07.17.00.00
> >
> > I am reducing this failure and will file a bug report.
> >
>
> This failure is actually a
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 12:28 -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >
> > I've build in a unified (symlink) tree, with sourceware stuff checked
> > out via cvs from date/time D2006.02.07.17.00.00
>
> I am reducing this failure and will file a bug report.
>
This failure is actually a latent bug elsewhere
>
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --040002010104040902030106
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> >>I've build in a unified (symlink) tree, with sourceware stuff checked
> >>out vi
On Feb 8, 2006, at 5:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the idea of matrix linking is quite different
You could have saved all the space and just said, yeah, but mine can
rebind printf. My response would be, yes, so can we. So, I've yet
to see much of a difference.
Andrew Pinski wrote:
I've build in a unified (symlink) tree, with sourceware stuff checked
out via cvs from date/time D2006.02.07.17.00.00
I am reducing this failure and will file a bug report.
I've just got a reduced test case, to be compiled with -O2 - see attachment.
struct gdb_e
>
> I've build in a unified (symlink) tree, with sourceware stuff checked
> out via cvs from date/time D2006.02.07.17.00.00
I am reducing this failure and will file a bug report.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
P.S.: The stage1 cc1 likewise loops in compute_antic (which is not
inlined into execute_pre then).
I've build in a unified (symlink) tree, with sourceware stuff checked
out via cvs from date/time D2006.02.07.17.00.00
The last issued command during the build was:
/mnt/scratch/nightly/2006-02-07/i686/./gcc/xgcc
-B/mnt/scratch/nightly/2006-02-07/i686/./gcc/
-B/usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/
Gentlemen.
I need some kind of assistance. I am trying to substitute function name during
the compilation procedure.
In order to do that I am:
1. creating new identifier with my name, like this:
t = get_identifier("Myfuction__ml_stub");
2. setting this name:
DECL_NAME(funcition) = t;
function is t
Mike, sorry for not answering.
I think the idea of matrix linking is quite different, let me try to
explain. I
would not say the matrix linking is the bynamic bunding, or rather to
say it is
not only the dynamic binding. Let us consider a sample:
void foo()
{
printf(foo\n);
}
int main(voi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /opt/work/tmp/obj/41]$ svn info /opt/work/svn/gcc-4_1-branch/
Path: /opt/work/svn/gcc-4_1-branch
URL: file:///opt/gcc-svn/branches/gcc-4_1-branch
Repository UUID: 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
Revision: 110691
Node Kind: directory
Schedule: normal
Last Changed Author: jakub
But there are still some failures. I'm not sure if they are okey. The
error messages are like these,
Executing on host: /home/smj/build_gcc_mips/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/smj/build_gcc_mips/gcc/
/home/smj/gcc-3.4.4-mips/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pch/static-1.c -O0
-I. -S -o static-1.s(timeout = 300)
PASS
But there are still some failures. I'm not sure if they are okey. The
error messages are like these,
Executing on host: /home/smj/build_gcc_mips/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/smj/build_gcc_mips/gcc/
/home/smj/gcc-3.4.4-mips/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pch/static-1.c -O0
-I. -S -o static-1.s(timeout = 300)
PAS
17 matches
Mail list logo
