If you really need to just jump into it you can try Chinook
(http://www.degarrah.com/chinookfree.php). It's a cross platform IDE
that ships with GCC/GDB and is free.
Chris
louise kelliher wrote:
Hiya, im wondering if you could help me, Im at my wits end and need to
cover c programming before
"Paul C. Leopardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I checked http://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html
> Under "Tools/packages necessary for modifying GCC" it has
>
> autogen version 5.5.4 (or later)
>
> My fault, but... I'm just testing my bootstrap and am not intending to modify
> gcc, so
Hi all, a quick follow-up below.
Best regards, Paul Leopardi
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:04 pm, Paul C. Leopardi wrote:
> In output of make -k check, I did notice that autogen is missing, causing
> an "Error 2", but the test carries on regardless. Is this OK?
...
> SUSE packaged autogen for SUSE Linux 9
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 10:53:02AM +1000, Paul C. Leopardi wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/gcc/gcc-4.0.1-obj> ../gcc-4.0.1/configure
> --prefix=/usr/local/gcc/gcc-4.0.1 --enable-threads=posix --disable-libgcj
> --with-system-zlib --enable-shared --enable-__cxa_atexit
> --enable-languages=c,c
"Paul C. Leopardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The preamble to g++ testing says:
>
> make[1]: [check-gcc] Error 1 (ignored)
> (rootme=`${PWDCMD-pwd}`; export rootme; \
> srcdir=`cd ../../gcc-4.0.1/gcc; ${PWDCMD-pwd}` ; export srcdir ; \
> cd testsuite; \
> EXPECT=expect ; export EXPECT ; \
> if
Mike,
Thanks. Reply below.
Best regards, Paul Leopardi
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:40 am, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jul 27, 2005, at 5:21 PM, Paul C. Leopardi wrote:
> >> What sets the value of this variable?
>
> We will expect you to be able to find the code and read it. The code
> you want to read is o
"Paul C. Leopardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/gcc/gcc-4.0.1-obj> ../gcc-4.0.1/configure
> --prefix=/usr/local/gcc/gcc-4.0.1 --enable-threads=posix --disable-libgcj
> --with-system-zlib --enable-shared --enable-__cxa_atexit
> --enable-languages=c,c++ x86_64-suse-lin
Hi Lance,
Thanks for your prompt reply. Point by point, below.
Best regards, Paul Leopardi
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:26 am, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> "Paul C. Leopardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hi all,
> > I did not receive a reply to my earlier message. Have I posted it to the
> > wrong list?
On Jul 27, 2005, at 5:21 PM, Paul C. Leopardi wrote:
How do I make the tests find the bootstrapped g++?
You don't it already does.
Shouldn't the test just do this automatically?
Yes.
How is the test supposed to find find the bootstrapped g++?
Carefully, see the source code.
Is it done
"Paul C. Leopardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
> I did not receive a reply to my earlier message. Have I posted it to the
> wrong
> list? If so, what is the right list for this message?
> Thanks
>
> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 07:23 pm, Paul C. Leopardi wrote:
> > How do I make the tests find
Hi all,
I did not receive a reply to my earlier message. Have I posted it to the wrong
list? If so, what is the right list for this message?
Thanks
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 07:23 pm, Paul C. Leopardi wrote:
> How do I make the tests find the bootstrapped g++? Shouldn't the test just
> do this automati
On Jul 27, 2005, at 2:18 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 11:10:56PM -0700, Dale Johannesen wrote:
Yes, it is. The following fixes my problem, and causes a couple of
3DNow-specific regressions
in the testsuite which I need to look at, but nothing serious; I think
it's gott
Hi Jim, the documentation for -Wstrict-aliasing=2 says:
It warns about all code which might break the strict aliasing
rules that the compiler is using for optimization. This warning
catches all cases, but it will also give a warning for some
ambiguous cases that are safe.
However
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 11:10:56PM -0700, Dale Johannesen wrote:
> Yes, it is. The following fixes my problem, and causes a couple of
> 3DNow-specific regressions
> in the testsuite which I need to look at, but nothing serious; I think
> it's gotten far enough to post
> for opinions. This is in
I'm fixing a problem with ObjC++ going beserk upon encountering
a syntax error, specifically not finding a '{' at the beginning
of a method definition. Is there a safe, established way of
repairing the token stream, i.e., inserting the '{' at that point?
That way, I could print an ObjC++-specific
-Original Message-
From: Mark
Sent: Monday, Jul 9, 2005 5:14 PM
To: Olga
Cc: Vera
Subject: wow, check this out !
http://teeny.servehttp.com/
Liu Haibin wrote:
(match_operand:SI 2 "register_operand" "r")
But the problem is it uses normal register, like r8, r9. How can I
write the define_peephole2 so that it uses custom registers?
See the "Constraints" section of the documentation. "r" means a general
reg
> 1. Does anyone know if or when there will be a libc supporting this
> target, and which one that will be (newlib?)?
newlib/libgloss patches are next on my list. There's a simulator and
gdb port on the way too. I have a couple of hardware boards as well,
which I'll use for testing and whatnot.
Hi everyone,
I was excited to find out that gcc now supports the Renesas M16C/M32C
architecture. I have compiled binutils and gcc from the CVS sources.
However, there are several questions that I have:
1. Does anyone know if or when there will be a libc supporting this
target, and which one that
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 13:39 -0400, drizzle drizzle wrote:
> Thanks for your help. I am attaching my patch. Most of the code dont
> modify anything. The code I am talking about is ia small piece in
> tree-data-ref.c in a function insert_annotations. The only
> modification in the rest of the code i
Thanks for your help. I am attaching my patch. Most of the code dont
modify anything. The code I am talking about is ia small piece in
tree-data-ref.c in a function insert_annotations. The only
modification in the rest of the code is that an extra variable refid
is set for particular array referen
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 17:54 +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 July 2005 17:33, drizzle drizzle wrote:
> > Hi
> > I am trying to insert a function call "foo" inside the tree list.
> >
> >
> > Inside this particular loop
> > for (bsi = bsi_start (bb); !bsi_end_p (bsi); bsi_next
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 12:58 -0400, drizzle drizzle wrote:
> Its inside this function
>
> static inline var_ann_t
> var_ann (tree t)
>
> from the error dump itseems to the following assertion
> gcc_assert (DECL_P (t))
>
>
> thanks
>
I'm gonna need a lot more info than that.
Maybe you shoul
Its inside this function
static inline var_ann_t
var_ann (tree t)
from the error dump itseems to the following assertion
gcc_assert (DECL_P (t))
thanks
On 7/27/05, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 12:33 -0400, drizzle drizzle wrote:
> > Hi
> > I am t
On Wednesday 27 July 2005 17:33, drizzle drizzle wrote:
> Hi
> I am trying to insert a function call "foo" inside the tree list.
>
>
> Inside this particular loop
> for (bsi = bsi_start (bb); !bsi_end_p (bsi); bsi_next (&bsi))
> {
>
> //if a particular condition i
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 12:33 -0400, drizzle drizzle wrote:
> Hi
> I am trying to insert a function call "foo" inside the tree list.
>
>
> Inside this particular loop
> for (bsi = bsi_start (bb); !bsi_end_p (bsi); bsi_next (&bsi))
> {
>
> //if a partic
Hi
I am trying to insert a function call "foo" inside the tree list.
Inside this particular loop
for (bsi = bsi_start (bb); !bsi_end_p (bsi); bsi_next (&bsi))
{
//if a particular condition is satisfied I do the following
tree id =
"Ioannis E. Venetis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I downloaded gcc 4.0.1 and created the manual with 'make dvi'. While
> browsing through it, I noticed the option -ftree-dse, which is
> mentioned in paragraph 3.1 (Options summary) and in paragraph 3.10
> (Options That Control Optimization) under
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 16:02 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Diego Novillo wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 03:09:09PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >
> > > i.e. while we see that the temporary pointer points to array[0], for
> > > SFT.2_6 (i.p) we don't see anything?
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 03:09:09PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > i.e. while we see that the temporary pointer points to array[0], for
> > SFT.2_6 (i.p) we don't see anything? So if we'd see { SFT.1 } here, too,
> > we'd be wrong in both cases.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 12:14:38PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>> Jack Howarth pointed out to me that when you look at the archives for
>> the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/current/,
>> you get this header:
>>
>> This is the m
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 03:09:09PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> i.e. while we see that the temporary pointer points to array[0], for
> SFT.2_6 (i.p) we don't see anything? So if we'd see { SFT.1 } here, too,
> we'd be wrong in both cases. -> aka my bug, correct?
>
What is SFT.1? array[0]?
C testcase ;)
typedef struct { int *p; } X;
void includes(const X *);
void test4(void)
{
int array[2] = { 2, 4 };
X i;
int * _p;
_p = array;
i.p = _p;
includes(&i);
}
if you change that to
i.p = array;
it works... !? But I note this in the failing case:
Pointed-to sets for poin
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 01:08:38PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> Points-to sets
>
> _first_5 = { array }
> array = { }
> array.1 = { }
> con = { array }
> D.1810_8 = { array }
> _ptr_9 = { array }
> D.1809 = { array }
> D.1796 = { array }
> D.1794 = { array }
> D.1797_16 = { ANYTHING }
>
[ ..
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 13:08 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I reduced my array aliasing libstdc++ failures to the following
> testcase:
>
> struct iterator
> {
> int* ptr;
> iterator(int* _ptr) : ptr(_ptr) {}
> };
>
> struct container {
> int* first;
> container(int*
Hello,
I downloaded gcc 4.0.1 and created the manual with 'make dvi'. While
browsing through it, I noticed the option -ftree-dse, which is mentioned
in paragraph 3.1 (Options summary) and in paragraph 3.10 (Options That
Control Optimization) under -O1.
However, this option is not documented
Hi all!
I reduced my array aliasing libstdc++ failures to the following
testcase:
struct iterator
{
int* ptr;
iterator(int* _ptr) : ptr(_ptr) {}
};
struct container {
int* first;
container(int* _first) : first(_first) {}
iterator begin() { return iterator(first); }
};
bool i
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Jack Howarth pointed out to me that when you look at the archives for
> the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/current/,
> you get this header:
>
> This is the mail archive of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list for the
> Fortran 9
Hi,
Jack Howarth pointed out to me that when you look at the archives for
the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/current/,
you get this header:
This is the mail archive of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list for the Fortran
95 project.
Note the [EMAIL PROTECTED] This should
39 matches
Mail list logo
