"Paul C. Leopardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all, > I did not receive a reply to my earlier message. Have I posted it to the > wrong > list? If so, what is the right list for this message? > Thanks > > On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 07:23 pm, Paul C. Leopardi wrote: > > How do I make the tests find the bootstrapped g++? Shouldn't the test just > > do this automatically? How is the test supposed to find find the > > bootstrapped g++? Is it done via an environment variable? Which environment > > variable? What sets the value of this variable? Is it a script or a > > program? > > > > What have I configured wrong, if anything? If this really is a bug, then > > why does the test work for Andreas Jaeger and not for me? > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00112.html > > > > Should I file another bug report and hope that I don't kust get WORKSFORME? > > Best regards
This is probably the right list. It's just that nobody happened to reply. gcc is a volunteer effort, particularly when it comes to answering questions on the mailing lists. In this case, it's hard to write a useful reply since you didn't provide any informative details. It is true that running the testsuite will normally use a newly built compiler, without requiring it to be installed. However, you didn't provide critical information like precisely what you did, precisely what happened, what you expected to happen instead, what version of the compiler you were building, and what host you were running on. So it's hard to know what to say. Or, in other words, WORKSFORME. Ian
