Re: [PING] [PATCH]: New Port(MAXQ)

Konark Goel, Noida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We submitted a patch for a new port for MAXQ architecture. > The original patch is > (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg02138.html) > The revised patch after incorporating few comments is > (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg

Re: invoke.texi: reference to web page that does not exist

Devang Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > invoke.texi mentions following URL for further info on visibility > #pragmas. >http://www.nedprod.com/programs/gccvisibility.html > but it does not exist. The page was up and working no longer than 2 weeks ago. Niall Douglas (which I'm CC:ing) is the

Re: mudflap abort

Now tracked as http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20339 -- Eyal Lebedinsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) attach .zip as .dat

How is lang.opt processed?

I'm looking to the broken behavior of gfortran with its -r8, -i8, and -d8 options. gfortran/lang.opt contains d8 F95 RejectNegative Set the default real and integer kinds to double precision i8 F95 Set the default integer kind to double precision r8 F95 Set the default real kind to double prec

Re: Things blocking fold_ARITY and fold_buildN

Hi, > I might need help on others. I'll try to go through these "KAZU" one > by one, but if you could volunteer to fix one, you are more than > welcome. Suggestions like "Here is what I would do" would be fine, > too. Roger kindly suggested what to do for each of these on IRC. Kazu Hirata

Things blocking fold_ARITY and fold_buildN

Hi, The uses of the whole expression in the current fold_ARITY are blocking transition to fold_ARITY (code, type, op0[, op1[, op2]]). Below I am showing places where we need to make changes in the form of a patch. Wherever 't' is used, we need to make changes. The first hunk comes from fold_una

gcc-4.0-20050305 is now available

Snapshot gcc-4.0-20050305 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.0-20050305/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.0 CVS branch with the following options: -rgcc-ss-4_0-20050305 You'll

cgraph_remove_node still slow

Hi! For a tramp3d -O2 compile we still have Flat profile: Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds. % cumulative self self total time seconds secondscalls s/call s/call name 5.10 4.53 4.53 129961 0.00 0.00 cgraph_remove_node 2.93 7.13

Re: MetaC++ announcement

Florian Weimer schrieb: The tree is a representation of language constructs, not a syntax tree. Does it include representation information, e.g. offsets of class members? Unfortunately, the XML sample is too unwieldy to tell. 8-/ it does preserve order of members, so processed source is compatibl

Re: MetaC++ announcement

* Stefan Strasser: > What? > - > MetaC++ > It is a library which is able to read and write C++ source code and > makes the tree available to its clients by API and by a XML format it > can read and write. > Parsing is done by a patched GCC. > The tree is a representation of language constructs

MetaC++ announcement

I've written a library which isn't exactly on-topic of gcc development, but is gcc related and there have been multiple requests for a gcc feature like this on the list(-fdump-translation-unit...), so here is some information about it: What? - MetaC++ It is a library which is able to read and w

Re: matching constraints in asm operands question

Quoting Jason Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Well, I assumed the same thing when I started poking at that code, but then > someone pointed out that it didn't actually work that way, and as I recall > the code does in fact assume a register. I certainly would not object to > making '+' work proper

Re: matching constraints in asm operands question

On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 00:24:10 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> static __inline__ void atomic_add(atomic_t *v, int i) >> { >> __asm__ __volatile__("addl %1,%0" : "+m" (*v) : "d" (i)); >> } >> >> Then the compiler complains with: >> >> /asm/atomic.h:33: warning: read-write constraint does not

Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor` warning.

On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:00:38AM -0500, Michael N. Moran wrote: > In embedded system work, and I'm sure in other circumstances, > it is the case that "placement new" is the norm and destructors > invoked explicitly (never on an abstract reference,) and the > delete operator goes unused. I shoul

Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor` warning.

Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: Karel Gardas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] class Foo { public: virtual unsigned short iiop_version() const = 0; }; and when I compile it, GCC emits warning from subject, although this class is really abstract and will never be instantiated. [...] I guess GCC assu

Re: Pascal front-end integration

On Sat, 5 Mar 2005, Waldek Hebisch wrote: > GPC uses backend data structure when possible. I see no reason to > duplicate backend functionality (Ada front is written in Ada, so they > _had to_ duplicate a lot of infrastructure). We can hide (and are doing > that now) most differences in macros. F

SV: Where did Acovea go?

A trail here: http://chaoticcoyote.blogspot.com/ Cheers, /ChJ -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Ben Elliston Skickat: den 5 mars 2005 13:25 Till: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Ämne: Where did Acovea go? I'm interested in revisiting Acovea for some academ

Where did Acovea go?

I'm interested in revisiting Acovea for some academic work I am doing, but www.coyotegulch.com seems to have vanished off the net. The last post I could find from Scott Robert Ladd was October 2004. Does anyone know where Scott and/or his web pages went? Thanks, Ben pgpwz5HR1ZWaB.pgp Descripti