solution of an old riddle [Re: reusing old configs in new versions [Re: FVWM: Reviewing FVWM]]

2013-01-27 Thread Michael Großer
Michael Großer wrote: > Eleven days ago, I migrated an existing (still dirty, but extremly powerful) > configuration to a new Debian Squeeze plattform with "FVWM 2.5.30". > > I had to change the order of some code to make my config work > with "FVWM 2.5.30". > > > > This code only works with "F

Re: FVWM: Debian Unstable now has FVWM 2.6.5

2013-01-27 Thread pebcak
will most likely build it in my cowbuilder setup for squeeze, lenny, wheezy and see what happens... if all goes well, it might end up on backports.debian.org. cheers, christine On 01/23/2013 07:50 PM, Jaimos F Skriletz wrote: > On 01/23/2013 11:29 AM, E Frank Ball III wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 23,

Re: FVWM: Debian Unstable now has FVWM 2.6.5

2013-01-27 Thread Michael Großer
You will run into the problem that MenuFvwmRoot does not contain "D. Debian Menu" anymore like it used to be in Debian Lenny with FVWM 2.5.26. Squeeze with FVWM 2.5.30 generates such a Debian menu, but only then when the 3876 lines of code of "/etc/X11/fvwm/system.fvwm2rc" are included, with a lot

Re: FVWM: Debian Unstable now has FVWM 2.6.5

2013-01-27 Thread Claude Rubinson
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:53:15AM +0100, Michael Großer wrote: > You will run into the problem that MenuFvwmRoot > does not contain "D. Debian Menu" anymore like > it used to be in Debian Lenny with FVWM 2.5.26. > > Squeeze with FVWM 2.5.30 generates such a Debian > menu, but only then when the 3

Re: FVWM: Debian Unstable now has FVWM 2.6.5

2013-01-27 Thread Michael . Grosser
Original-Nachricht > Datum: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:13:15 -0600 > Von: Claude Rubinson > An: fvwm > Betreff: Re: FVWM: Debian Unstable now has FVWM 2.6.5 > On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:53:15AM +0100, Michael Großer wrote: > > You will run into the problem that MenuFvwmRoot > > does

Re: FVWM: Debian Unstable now has FVWM 2.6.5

2013-01-27 Thread Jaimos Skriletz
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 08:49:14PM +0100, michael.gros...@gmx.de wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:53:15AM +0100, Michael Großer wrote: > > > You will run into the problem that MenuFvwmRoot > > > does not contain "D. Debian Menu" anymore like > > > it used to be in Debian Lenny with FVWM 2.5

Re: FVWM: Debian Unstable now has FVWM 2.6.5

2013-01-27 Thread Michael Großer
Jaimos Skriletz wrote: > On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 08:49:14PM +0100, michael.gros...@gmx.de wrote: >> >> > On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:53:15AM +0100, Michael Großer wrote: >> > > You will run into the problem that MenuFvwmRoot >> > > does not contain "D. Debian Menu" anymore like >> > > it used to be

Re: FVWM: Debian Unstable now has FVWM 2.6.5

2013-01-27 Thread Jaimos Skriletz
> > > > the menu is created with a debian menu-methods and the output is the > > /etc/X11/fvwm/menudefs.hook by default on the debian package (I just > > checked this myself). > > > > 'Read /etc/X11/fvwm/menudefs.hook' will just read the debian menu but not > > add it to your root menu. So tha

Re: FVWM: Debian Unstable now has FVWM 2.6.5

2013-01-27 Thread Michael Großer
Jaimos Skriletz wrote: >> > >> > the menu is created with a debian menu-methods and the output is the >> > /etc/X11/fvwm/menudefs.hook by default on the debian package (I just >> > checked this myself). >> > >> > 'Read /etc/X11/fvwm/menudefs.hook' will just read the debian menu but not >> > ad

Re: FVWM: why 2 archives for this list?

2013-01-27 Thread Chris Bannister
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:23:57AM +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote: > hi, > I discovered that there are 2 archives for this list: > >http://www.mail-archive.com/fvwm@fvwm.org/maillist.html > >http://www.mail-archive.com/fvwm@lists.math.uh.edu/ > > the 1st one shows all posts, but in the 2n