On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 21:02 +1000, Stuart Longland wrote:
> On 8/2/24 13:51, hw wrote:
> > It has become a very limited option years ago and is basically
> > obsolete. Just try to run, for example, firefox on a remote host via
> > X11 forwarding. I suspect that an
On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 18:10 +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 05:50:44AM +0100, hw wrote:
> > I still don't see why it shouldn't be possible. I never expected a
> > port, and I understand that the architectures of X11 and Wayland are
> > very diff
On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 12:38 -0800, mark_at_yahoo wrote:
> On 2/7/24 20:09, hw wrote:
> > On Sat, 2024-02-03 at 13:53 +0100, Lucio Chiappetti wrote:
> > > I hope to be able to go on with Xorg until I live.
> >
> > Or use wayland and start living now :) Living in t
On Sat, 2024-02-03 at 22:05 +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> [...]
> GTK and QT dropping support for XLib, that's the time to worry -- as there
> could, in theory, be a time when Firefox or Chromium no longer run under X
> directly, without forcing a Wayland compositor. That's the real
> nail-in-the-co
On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 22:42 -0600, Jason Tibbitts wrote:
> I'm running wayland right now (with the KDE desktop) and can fire up
> a local xterm or ssh to a different machine and run xterm and it
> works just fine.
Does this have to be done from an X11 client (like xterm) so you're
doing it from wi
On Sat, 2024-02-03 at 13:53 +0100, Lucio Chiappetti wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2024, Robert Heller wrote:
>
> > Afterall, no one needs more then one computer...
>
> I suppose there is a smiley missing after the sentence :-)
>
> My usual way of working (post-COVID, from home) involves usually one or
On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 10:55 -0500, Paul Fox wrote:
> I realize this discussion is drifting away from fvwm, but...
>
> ...a major part of my daily activity has always depended on X11's
> ability to function on remote displays. Does that functionality
> (i.e. "DISPLAY=remotehost:0" vs. "DISPLAY=:0"
On Tue, 2024-01-30 at 14:02 -0700, Jaimos Skriletz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 1:25 PM hw wrote:
> >
> > so is there finally a version that works for wayland?
> >
> No, fvwm only works with xorg and most likely won't be ported.
>
> > What are t
Hi,
so is there finally a version that works for wayland?
What are the differences between fvwm2 and fvwm3?
Dominik Vogt writes:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 03:22:54AM +0200, hw wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Thanks to your other post, I finally got this:
>>
>>
>> ,
>> | [fvwm][__explain_placement]: placed new window 0x1400010 'Mozilla Firefox':
>&
Viktor Griph writes:
> Den mån 27 aug. 2018 00:27hw skrev:
>
>> With Firefox, I think using FixedPPosition, !UsePPosition fix it as
>> well, but the problem is that for some reason, fvwm does not place the
>> windows according to the placement policy.
>
> As you describe it it sounds as if Firef
Dominik Vogt writes:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 10:43:59PM +0200, hw wrote:
>> > If you use a .xinitrc you can have the WM output directed where ever
>> > you like otherwise the distro will pick a place.
>>
>> I tried that by redirecting the output of fvwm in
Dominik Vogt writes:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 10:36:58PM +0200, hw wrote:
>> Dominik Vogt writes:
>>
>> > On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 09:30:14PM +0200, hw wrote:
>>
>> > [...]
>> >> IIUC, I explicitly told the window manager to ignore what the p
Dominik Vogt writes:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 09:30:14PM +0200, hw wrote:
> [...]
>> IIUC, I explicitly told the window manager to ignore what the program
>> tries to do about the placement of the windows it creates, and yet the
>> window manager still allows the prog
Dan Espen writes:
> hw writes:
>
>> Dan Espen writes:
>>
>>> hw writes:
>>>
>>>> Dominik Vogt writes:
>>>>> No, in the output of the X server, wherever that goes.
>>>>
>>>> After trying to get systemd to
Dan Espen writes:
> hw writes:
>
>> Dominik Vogt writes:
>>> No, in the output of the X server, wherever that goes.
>>
>> After trying to get systemd to create log files, it apparently goes into
>> /var/log/Xorg.0.log (where it might have gone to befor
Dominik Vogt writes:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 10:41:45PM +0200, hw wrote:
>> Dominik Vogt writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 07:10:47PM +0200, hw wrote:
> [...]
>> > Well, the full array of options to get shitty applications under
>> > c
Dominik Vogt writes:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 10:58:51PM +0200, hw wrote:
>> Stefan Blachmann writes:
>> > I was annoyed and looked into that.
>> > session[re]store.js is a *horrible* mess of code, and to understand
>> > its workings, I just di
Stefan Blachmann writes:
> On 8/24/18, hw wrote:
>
>> But that doesn´t work either, the windows are placed on top of each
>> other again. With !UsePPosition alone, I get the windows placed as I
>> want it, but it means Firefox is moving them rather than that fvwm
>
Dominik Vogt writes:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 07:10:47PM +0200, hw wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Fvwms manpage says:
>>
>>
>>Placement policy options and window stacking
>> !UsePPosition instructs fvwm to ignore the program
>&g
Stefan Blachmann writes:
> This is a long story...
> sessionrestore.js some day years ago got a regression and no longer
> did check for out-of-bounds coordinates indicating windows being
> placed on other virtual screens, i.e. it placed windows way
> off-screen, at crazy coordinates like -4,
Hi!
Fvwms manpage says:
Placement policy options and window stacking
!UsePPosition instructs fvwm to ignore the program
specified position (PPosition hint) when adding new
windows. Using PPosition is required for some
applications,
Robert Brockway writes:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2018, Robert Brockway wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2018, hw wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> how can I prevent fvwm from automatically switching to the desktop page
>>> where an application like gajim receive
Michelle,
it´s so nice to see a post from you :) I remember you from the
debian-users mailing list a long time ago.
"Michelle Konzack" writes:
> Am DATE hackte AUTHOR in die Tasten: hw
>> Hi,
>>
>> how can I prevent fvwm from automatically switching to
Hi,
how can I prevent fvwm from automatically switching to the desktop page
where an application like gajim receives a message and activates a
window (or whatever it does to force this switch)?
As you can imagine, it´s very annoying when you´re suddenly switched to
a different program residing on
25 matches
Mail list logo
