Re: FVWM: Ban area for window placement

2008-11-04 Thread Jesús Guerrero
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 00:39:36 + "Renato Caldas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Jesús Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've had such a setup with two screens (1600x1200 and 1204x768) for a long > > time > > and using fvwm. Never had a problem with it. > > > >

Re: FVWM: Ban area for window placement

2008-11-04 Thread Renato Caldas
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Jesús Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've had such a setup with two screens (1600x1200 and 1204x768) for a long > time > and using fvwm. Never had a problem with it. > > so I suspect it's something to do with xorg not being configured correctly. > Unless > y

Re: FVWM: Ban area for window placement

2008-11-04 Thread Jesús Guerrero
I've had such a setup with two screens (1600x1200 and 1204x768) for a long time and using fvwm. Never had a problem with it. so I suspect it's something to do with xorg not being configured correctly. Unless you didn't compile fvwm with proper xinerama support. Well, I was using nvidia's twinvie

Re: FVWM: Ban area for window placement

2008-11-04 Thread Perry Hutchison
> > ... if I do a 'xwd -root |convert xwd:- png:screen.png' I get a > > 3040x1200 screen.png where the top right looks scrambled (see > > http://www.der-frank.org/tmp/sscreen.jpg [48kB]). However, xdpyinfo > > states, that I have "number of screens:1". Confusing. >

Re: FVWM: Ban area for window placement

2008-11-04 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 04:39:45PM +0100, Frank Gruellich wrote: > * Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3. Nov 08: > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 07:22:20PM +0100, Frank Gruellich wrote: > > > I've made Xinerama working with my notebook display and an attached > > > external TFT screen. > > You should

Re: FVWM: Ban area for window placement

2008-11-04 Thread Frank Gruellich
* Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3. Nov 08: > On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 07:22:20PM +0100, Frank Gruellich wrote: > > I've made Xinerama working with my notebook display and an attached > > external TFT screen. > You should try to fix the Xinerama configuration. Is it wrong? X seems to know, that

Re: FVWM: Is http://www.fvwm.org/cgi-bin/fvwm-bug working?

2008-11-04 Thread Pavel Vávra
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 10:09:45 + "Thomas Adam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/11/4 Pavel Vávra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Isn't it better to remove BTS from web pages? > > Quite possibly, but it isn't my call. There might be one or two > people who use it, although it hasn't been used for some

Re: FVWM: Is http://www.fvwm.org/cgi-bin/fvwm-bug working?

2008-11-04 Thread Thomas Adam
2008/11/4 Pavel Vávra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Isn't it better to remove BTS from web pages? Quite possibly, but it isn't my call. There might be one or two people who use it, although it hasn't been used for some time. -- Thomas Adam

Re: FVWM: Is http://www.fvwm.org/cgi-bin/fvwm-bug working?

2008-11-04 Thread Pavel Vávra
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 21:51:24 + "Thomas Adam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/11/3 Pavel Vávra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, > > I try to send a bug to BTS, but no message appears in "incoming" queue. Is > > it working or is an alternative how can I report a bug? > > Send an email to [EMAIL PR