Hello Freesurfer experts.
I am trying to run a QDEC analysis on some MRI data I have. I want to see if
thickness is correlated with language scores I have for each subject, while
accounting for differences in age, and gender.
I would like to select the gender as a fixed variable, and both the a
I am wondering if there a way to account for repeated measures when running a
QDEC analysis. I have 60 scans taken from 39 subjects (ranging between 1 scan
per subject to 5 scans per subject).
Over all I am trying to corrlelate freesurfer measures of thickness and volume
with scores from a lan
Hello Freesurfer experts,
I have two separate questions.
1. I am doing an MRI study on young children (3-5 years old). I have read in a
few a different places that Freesurfer isn't ideal for analyzing young
subjects. It does seem to be processing my subjects just fine though, with the
exceptio
m.mgz volumes?
cheers
Bruce
On
Fri, 13 Jun 2014, Walton, Matt wrote:
> Hello Freesurfer experts,
> I have two separate questions.
>
> 1. I am doing an MRI study on young children (3-5 years old). I have read in
> a few a different places that Freesurfer isn't ideal for analyzing
rectly.
> Can you upload the subject and we will take a look?
> cheers
> Bruce
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Walton, Matt wrote:
>
> Hello Freesurfer team,
>> I've used freesurfer to segment (recon-all) approximately 30 different
>> subjects from a study. I'v
ject
>
>
> cheers
> Bruce
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Walton, Matt wrote:
>
> Hey Bruce.
>> Thanks for the response. How do I go about uploading the subject?
>>
>> On Monday, July 28, 2014, Bruce Fischl
>> wrote:
>> Hi Matt
>>
>>
Hey Bruce,
I uploaded a subject that you requested a few days ago (problems with
segmentation in the occipital lobe). I just wanted to make sure the file
transferred successfully, and if you have had a change to analyze.
Thanks,
Matt
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Walton, Matt
wrote
e another look at it now to try to improve the
> segmentation further.
>
> Best,
> Lee
>
>
> On 07/30/2014 12:21 PM, Walton, Matt wrote:
>
> Hey Bruce,
>
> I uploaded a subject that you requested a few days ago (problems with
> segmentation in the occipital lobe)
ntioned above, but I don't think I
> was aggressive enough on the first attempt so it didn't help much. I will
> try this again to see if it leads to further improvements.
>
> Best,
> Lee
>
>
> On 08/06/2014 11:54 AM, Walton, Matt wrote:
>
> Hey Bruce,
>
eers
> Bruce
>
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2014, Walton, Matt wrote:
>
> Thanks for your help. It is most appreciated.
>> I thought I would mention that these subjects are quite young (3-4 years
>> old). I've read a few posts that free surfer is not ideal for analyzing
>&g
Hey,
Bruce, yes WM is already classified as 110 in the regions, but grey matter
is still being excluded.
Matt
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Bruce Fischl
wrote:
> Hi Matt
> Not really. Is the white matter in those regions already 110?
> Bruce
>
> On Aug 12, 2014, at 8:21 PM
11 matches
Mail list logo
