Hi,
Is it possible to run the LGI on data that has already been longitudinally
processed?
For example, when I try to run:
recon-all -s subject001.long.subject001_base -localGI
I get the following error:
ERROR: Are you trying to run or re-run a longitudinal time point?
If so, please spe
That command works. Thanks so much, Martin!
Best,
Tricia
From: Martin Reuter
To: Tricia Merkley
Cc: Freesurfer list
Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2013 9:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] LGI longitudinal data
Hi Tricia,
try
recon-all -long subject001
Hi,
Would there need to be any special considerations when calculating lgi with
microcephalic brains? Could TIV ever affect the results and need to be
accounted for? (It doesn't seem like it should, but just wanted to verify.)
Thanks,
Tricia Me
)
Kernel info: Linux 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 x86_64
cmd line executed: recon-all -s -segstats -wmparc
Thanks so much,
Tricia Merkley
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
further?
Thanks,
Tricia Merkley
--- On Tue, 5/27/08, Doug Greve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Doug Greve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] White Matter Regional Volumes
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Date: Tuesday, May 27, 2008, 9:17 AM
T
We ran several subjects using version 4.0.4 and now need to reinstall
freesurfer to finish the processing. Is there a linux centos4, 32 bit version
available somewhere?
Thanks,
Tricia Merkley
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer
.0.5-full.tar.gz
from this page:
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/Download
Nick
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 14:59 -0700, Tricia Merkley wrote:
> We ran several subjects using version 4.0.4 and now need to reinstall
> freesurfer to finish the processing. Is there a linux centos4
Hi Freesurfers,
Does anyone have a suggestion for an optimal scanner protocol for structural
scans using Siemens Trio 3T?
Thanks,
Tricia Merkley
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Hi Freesurfers,
Is there a solution for fixing a bad talairach transform as shown in the
attached figures? Recon-all completed without error (with the -notal-check
included, v4.5.0), and the output looks pretty good. However I'm concerned
that the 'IntraCranialVol' value will be off since it
Have you seen anything like this before?
Thanks,
Tricia
--- On Thu, 8/12/10, Bruce Fischl wrote:
From: Bruce Fischl
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Talairach xform problem
To: "Tricia Merkley"
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Date: Thursday, August 12, 2010, 6:34 PM
Hi Tricia,
when
., as compared to 1mm cubic
voxels. When would it be appropriate to use the '-cm' flag for mri_convert?
Thanks,
Tricia Merkley
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/f
e.
Thanks,
Tricia
--- On Wed, 3/9/11, Bruce Fischl wrote:
From: Bruce Fischl
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Small voxel size
To: "Tricia Merkley"
Cc: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu"
Date: Wednesday, March 9, 2011, 5:01 PM
What is the resolution of your other subjects?
On M
,
Tricia
--- On Thu, 3/10/11, Bruce Fischl wrote:
From: Bruce Fischl
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Small voxel size
To: "Tricia Merkley"
Cc: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu"
Date: Thursday, March 10, 2011, 6:37 AM
Hi Tricia,
I don't think you can use that subject. It will
between analysis methods, whereas cerebellar
WM volumes differed (likely due to differing boundary inclusion/exclusion
criteria and challenges for image quantification due to the numerous folia of
the cerebellum).
Hope this helps.
Tricia Merkley
--- On Fri, 5/13/11, McLean John (NHS Greater
volumes in 1mm^3
though, since the resulting volumes are reported as 0.5x0.5x0.5mm^3. Is that
correct?
Thanks,
Tricia Merkley
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The
15 matches
Mail list logo