Dear Zheng,
Question 1: In the dev version, all labels are rendered by default. In previous
versions: it’s probably best to open the file twice, and render the hippo with
the range 200-249 and the amygdala with the range 7000-7020.
Question 2: open lh.hippoAmygLabels-T1.v2x.mgz instead of
lh.h
We are looking into all this. We’ll have updates soon.
Cheers,
/Eugenio
--
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/
From: on behalf of Eva Hilland
Reply-To: Freesurfer support
Hi Dorit,
The reason why the colors look off is that mri_aparc2aseg will
automatically add 1000 for left cerebral cortex and add 2000 for right
cerebral cortex. Therefore, for example, a left hemisphere voxel in network
5 will have a value of 1005 in your test.mgz. Here is my suggestion:
1. Find
Hi Patrik
we report both the number of voxels and the volume of each structure in
the stats files. Even for 1mm data we use partial volume estimation in the
newer versions so that these numbers will not be the same. In general we
find that the partial volume estimation helps accuracy, and that
Dear FreeSurfer Team,
Unsure whether this is the correct email for queries, apologies it not.
I am wondering if it is possible to combine data set from two different
protocols with different slice numbers.
For example, (see attached screenshots):
1st - SAG ADNI GO ACC SPGR – 196 slice
Hello!
Thank You for the answer. So, If I understand this in good way - version
6.0 works with original data voxel size and the data are not conformed to
voxel size 1x1x1 mm. Can I ask if also version 5.3 conform data that have
different voxel size from 1x1x1 mm.
Thank You very much!
patrik krump
Hi Maria
you could but they have different contrast/distortion properties, so it
isn't clear to me that it is a win. I guess the easiest thing to do would
be to "conform" them both with mri_convert, then try registering/averaging
them.
cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 1 Feb 2018, Gudbrandsen, Maria wr
Hi Patrik
They both can conform if you ask them to or not if you tell them not to.
6.0 does a much better job using the native highres data though
cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 1 Feb 2018, Patrik Krumpolec wrote:
Hello!Thank You for the answer. So, If I understand this in good way - version
6.0 wor
Hello Jason,
The freesurfer folks may have some suggestions for adjusting certain
parameters, but you can also try some denoising approaches before going into
the freesurfer pipeline. There are a number of flavors. The link below is a
good place to start I think.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/
Dear Experts,
I was wondering if anyone might know why the WM hypointensities total number in
aseg does not match the sum of left and right white matter hypointensities.
Thanks,
Arkadiy
--
Arkadiy L. Maksimovskiy, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Research Fellow
McLean Imaging Center, McLean Hospital
Departmen
Dear experts,
I’m currently performing quality control for my data, and most of my issues so
far have been that in many cases adding control points has not been able to
extend the white surface. I’ve also noticed that most of the regions where I
have needed to add CPs are in the parietal region
Hi Bruce
I found a directory having a file with ".curv", open terminal and run
following command.
[root@localhost surf]# mris_convert rh.curv rh.curv.asc
nquads=4587523, nvertices=476
ERROR: MRISread: file 'rh.curv' has many more faces than vertices!
Probably trying to use a scalar data file as a
12 matches
Mail list logo