Hi Patrik
They both can conform if you ask them to or not if you tell them not to. 
6.0 does a much better job using the native highres data though
cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 1 Feb 2018, Patrik Krumpolec wrote:

Hello!Thank You for the answer. So, If I understand this in good way - version 
6.0 works with
original data voxel size and the data are not conformed to voxel size 1x1x1 mm. 
Can I ask if also
version 5.3 conform data that have different voxel size from 1x1x1 mm.

Thank You very much!

patrik krumpolec

2018-02-01 16:13 GMT+01:00 Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>:
      Hi Patrik

      we report both the number of voxels and the volume of each structure in
      the stats files. Even for 1mm data we use partial volume estimation in the
      newer versions so that these numbers will not be the same. In general we
      find that the partial volume estimation helps accuracy, and that 6.0 is
      usually  more accurate than 5.2

      cheers
      Bruce


      On Thu, 1 Feb 2018, Patrik Krumpolec wrote:

      > I want to ask about differences in brain segmentation with freesurfer 
version 5.2.0
      and 6.0.0.My
      > dicom data have original size 0.375x0.375x0.75 mm and 600, 640, 224 
voxels. If I
      process the data
      > vith the version 5.2.0, freesurfer conformed the data to 1 mm size and 
256 voxels for
      all
      > directions. In the result brain structures has volume eguals to number 
of voxels.
      > But if i use version 6.0.0, there are data not conformed and in the 
results the volume
      of structure
      > is different form number of voxels.
      >
      > So, now I don't know what results is correct: from the version 5.2.0 or 
6.0.0
      >
      > At first I think that version 6.0.0 is not good because my collegues 
from another
      institution have
      > results with the volume eguals to number of voxels (version 5.3) but 
they have data
      with voxel size
      > 1x1x1 mm. So, I think that it is natural that volume is eguals to 
number of voxels.
      But my data have
      > not 1x1x1 mm voxel size.
      >
      > Please, Could You help me! Thank You very much!
      >
      > patrik krumpolec
      >
      >
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.




_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to