It does look like the problem is the rh.orig. Do you have read
permissions for that file? It may be that the file is corrupt. Can you
load just that file in freeview or tksurfer? If not, you can try to
regenerate it by running mris_fix_topology (look in the
subject/scripts/recon-all.log file fo
Thanks for your quick answer.
Yes, I have read permissions for that file. I can also load the rh.orig into
freeview without any error message appearing in the terminal. Looks quite nice.
I tried using mris_fix_topology by taking the exact command from the
recon-all.log of the particular subject.
Hi FS experts,
I have T1 images with low quality (noise and artifacts). I am wondering if smoothing these images, before runing the command "Recon-all", can help to improve the segmentation and parcellation process for these images.
Thanks for any advice!
Bests,
John
___
Hi John
you can try mri_nlfilter if you like. It implement a nonlocal means/medians
algorithm that I wrote in 1995 or so:
Bruce Fischl and Eric L. Schwartz.
1999. Adaptive Nonlocal Filtering: A Fast Alternative to Anisotropic
Diffusion for Image Enhancement. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. I
Hi Yeo- Thanks very much for your answer. Yes the data is in mni305 space.
I process my fmri data with
preproc-sess -s rest210 -fsd bold -surface fsaverage lhrh -mni305 -fwhm 6
-per-run -stc odd
and then to extract ROI time series values I did
mri_segstats --annot fsaverage rh aparc --i
rest210/b
Hello Kate,
Thanks for the information. We have seen similar behavior with previous
XQuartz releases in the past as well. This tends to "freeze" certain
vesion of OSX with certain versions of XQuartz. I will take a closer
look but this is usually something that we have to deal with.
-Zeke
On
Hi Greg
you could threshold then look at Hausdorff distance of the blobs. Or you
could smooth before computing correlation as that will take spatial stuff
into account.
Or if you have a patch that you want to cross-correlate against the rest of
the surface you could do it on the sphere, althou
Hello,
Hello,
I am getting the following error:
ERROR: matrix is ill-conditioned or badly scaled, condno = 1e+08
Command line:
mri_glmfit --y lh.BD_SD.thickness.10B.mgh --fsgd
FSGD_Collapsed_Across_Smokers_demeaned.fsgd dods --C BDvsSD1.mtx --surf
fsaverage l
Hi Mailing List,
I am attempting to apply the Yeo 2011 7-network fucntional parcellations
to a set of fs MRIs processed with v5.1.0. Below are listed the first
three steps I plan to take and I am seeking advice as to:
A) Whether this approach is valid.
B) Steps to take next.
*
Steps 1-3:
*
FREESURFER_HOME: /home/rcf-proj/kap/shared/freesurfer
Build stamp: freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.3.0
RedHat release: CentOS release 6.7 (Final)
Kernel info: Linux 2.6.32-573.22.1.el6.x86_64 x86_64
Hello Freesurfer,
For some strange reason, a participant's entire aseg is being
*Hello,*
*I’m trying to run recon-all -lgi - s Subjectname on my data but i am
getting this error!*
***
Error in dsearchn (line 79)
[d(i),t(i)] = min(sum((x-yi).^2,2));
Error in mesh_vertex_nearest (line 29)
nearestIndex = dsearchn(ve
Hi everyone,
I processed and edited 300 participants for our study using Freesurfer 5.3
and I'd like to move to using the dev version that's currently available
because we have a bunch more data that's been collected and I think it does
a better job. (This question also applies to moving to v 6 wh
12 matches
Mail list logo