Hi list,
I'm performing the FS-FAST for functional connectivity analysis on two groups.
I'm using tkmedit to visualize the results. Is possible to load a scatter plot
which describes the values of each subject for each selected voxel? e.g. I'd
like to verify the presence of outliers.Scatter plot
Hi Ri,
you can process data with higher resolution than 1mm^3 if you follow the
HiResRecon (https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HiResRecon). The changes
to the pipeline were done using v5.1, however, this should still work fine.
Best,
Falk
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: freesurfe
Hi Pedro
if you are able to change the acquisition in the future you might try
something closer to isotropic, which would let you get the echo time
down. Longer TE decreases contrast as it allows some T2* weighting (which
is in the opposite contrast direction to T1) to creep in.
cheers
Bruce
Dear FreeSurfers,
I use FS v5.3 on Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS. I am working on a longitudinal study
and now I have problems with my machine. It started to work very slowly and
it's losing the Internet connection frequently without apparent reason. I
believe there's a bug that affects its performance quite
that should be fine
Bruce
On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Mihaela Stefan wrote:
> Dear FreeSurfers,
> I use FS v5.3 on Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS. I am working on a longitudinal study
> and now I have problems with my machine. It started to work very slowly and
> it's losing the Internet connection frequently without
I had a question about using different components of Freesurfer 4.5 and
Freesurfer 5 in an analysis. We were wondering whether it is possible to
do preprocessing in Freesufer 5, but run the analysis on Freesufer 4.5 or
whether the output from preprocessing in Freesurfer 5 is not compatible
with th
Thanks!
Mihaela
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Bruce Fischl
wrote:
> that should be fine
> Bruce
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Mihaela Stefan wrote:
>
> > Dear FreeSurfers,
> > I use FS v5.3 on Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS. I am working on a longitudinal study
> > and now I have problems with my machine. It sta
hmmm, looks like it is a bug in the icosahedral supertesselation
algorithm we use as it's in the icosahedron too:
mris_info --v 0 $FREESURFER_HOME/lib/bem/ic7.tri
v 0: (0.0, 0.0, 1.0), 5 nbrs
0: v 40964, dist 0.0
1: v 40962, dist 0.0
2: v 40965, dist 0.0
3: v 40967
