Dear all,
I have a ROI on the left hemisphere and I'd like to extract cortical
thickness values from the homologous region in the right hemisphere. For
this I applied the interhemispheric registration process and got my ROI
mapped into the right hemisphere in /subject/xhemi/label.
However when I
Hi list,
I am looking for a complete reference to scriptable commands for Freeview,
comparable to what exists for tksurfer (e.g.
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/TkSurferGuide/TkSurferScripting/TkSurferScriptingReference)
Does this exist?
Thanks!
___
I
Hi (Martin),
- version 5.1 (Ubuntu 64b)
- command: long_mris_slopes --qdec ./qdec/long.qdec.table.n114.dat --meas
thickness --hemi lh --do-avg --do-rate --do-pc1 --do-spc --do-stack
--do-label --time ISI_years --qcache fsaverage
- attached: first 3 lines of qdec table containing the info for subje
Hi Inge,
Freeview does not support tcl scripting. It does have lots of
command-line options that might fit your need. Run 'freeview -h" will
display a complete list of the available options.
Best,
Ruopeng
On 6/29/12 7:16 AM, Inge Kasbohm Amlien wrote:
Hi list,
I am looking for a complete re
Hi,
In regard to the surface files, is it correct to say that the wm and pial
vertices correspond to each other (e.g., wm vertex # 12345 corresponds to pial
vertex # 12345 as the minimum distance between the two surfaces), and so have
the same number of vertices?
Also, I would like to "coloriz
Hi John
they are guaranteed to have the same # of vertices, so the answer is kind
of "yes", but the thickness is not the distance between them, but rather
the distance from the closest point (which might or might not be the
"same" vertex).
You can use mri_surf2vol to sample back into the vol
Hi Mia
Why do you care? It's probably optic radiation and won't affect anything
Cheers
Bruce
On Jun 28, 2012, at 2:38 PM, "Borzello, Mia" wrote:
> just to make sure. i use tksurfer to edit this right? I attached a
> screenshot. There is a small groove sticking up then i need to correct. also
Hi all,
I am trying to visualize the surface map showing the Post Treatment - Pre
Treatment cortical thickness in a single subject. The Post and Pre scans
are processed like 2 separate subjects.
I used the commands:
mris_preproc --f
/cluster/roffman/users/Stable5_PerRun/Subject_Files/FB12_Pairs/
Hi Adam, use the "paired" method in the fsgd examples.
doug
On 06/29/2012 11:58 AM, Adam Nitenson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to visualize the surface map showing the Post Treatment - Pre
> Treatment cortical thickness in a single subject. The Post and Pre scans
> are processed like 2 separat
Hi Adam,
if you use the longitudinal stream for it (it is designed for that stuff
and will increase reliability), you will have the surfaces in the same
space and can simply subtract the thickness files (mris_calc) and
visualize on any one of them.
Best, Martin
On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 11:58 -0400
Hi Joost,
the tp id cannot be the same as the base id:
fsid fsid-base ISI_years Group Gender Age ICV
11298 11298 0 patient F 16 1441
11298_2 11298 1.83 patient F 17.92 1396
I am amazed that you were able to process it this way?
So either call the first time point
11298_1
or call the base 11298_
Hi Torben - I'm looking at all the invocations of "trac-all -prep" in your
log file, and they've both exited with an error (the same bvecs error).
> grep prep trac-all.log
-prep -c /Users/torben/Desktop/tracon/tracon
New invocation of trac-preproc
/Applications/MRSoftware/freesurfer/bin/trac-pre
I got an error beginning with this.
Thanks for any help
Error in analyze: command failed: mri_glmfit --y
//qdec/LH_insula_thick/y.mgh --fsgd
**
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be
used for urgent or
Hi everyone,
I got the error I just mentioned. Terminal window says "no contrasts specified".
I am trying to use "timepoint" (1-4) as a discrete factor to look at thickness
across time. I guess I will have to resort to longitudinal processing?
Thanks for the help
-Anson
***
Hi, I am new to freesurfer. It seems recon-all is the most time-consuming
command. I tried to run it on a HPC cluster with MPI and got the error "ERROR:
it appears that recon-all is already running and re-run" and the job stopped
right away. Is the code even parallelized? I had no problem runnin
15 matches
Mail list logo