Hi Bruce,
thank a lot for your attention. I'll post to you the DICOM header so you
will found all the information. We have a GE, Signa 3.0 T with a phased
array coil at 8 channel and I haven't any access to other coil. Follow the
DICOM header
Format: 'DICOM'
Dear all,
I'm encountering the following error in the otherwise excellent
longitudinal scheme when adding the -uselongbasectrlvol flag:
Command:
recon-all -long ${s}_tp1 ${s} -all -uselongbasectrlvol
--
#
#...@# Intensity Normalization Wed Apr 14 18:12
Hi
We were able to extract the vertex number (and MNI coordinates) for the
finer parcellation as well as for the aparc.a2005s parcellation by using
mri_annotation2label. Now we have a .label file for each parcellation
where
all vertices number (and their coordinates) that belong to a
parcellati
Hi Diana,
the vertex # should be the same in all parcellation, so you just need to
lookup a different label for the same index. Note that you can load the
annotations into matlab using read_annotation.m if you want.
cheers,
Bruce
On Thu, 15 Apr
2010, Diana Wotruba wrote:
> Hi
> We were able t
to fix this, you will need to edit recon-all (with a text editor).
search for this line:
-mask $longbasedir/mri/brain.mgz
and put a \ at the end of it.
n.
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 11:01 +0200, Lars Tjelta Westlye wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I'm encountering the following error in the other
Hello,
I'm trying to run selxavg3-sess for an analysis with TER < TR, and it
errors with "design is ill-conditioned". I searched the mailing list
archive, and the only past problem of this sort that I found was
associated with a faulty tpef file, which I am not using.
The details: There is only o
Dear FS experts
I tried to run mri_surf2surf on parcellations produced by
mris_divide_parcellation but there is the following problem:
[Juergen-Haenggis-Mac-Pro:/Applications/freesurfer/subjects] juergenhaenggi%
mri_surf2surf --srcsubject fsaverage_divide_parc --sval-annot
/Application/freesurfer
Did you optimize the stimulus schedule with the idea that you would do
sub-TR FIR estimation? Eg, you would have had to have run optseq2 with
this in mind. If not, then you probably cannot do an FIR analysis.
Instead, assume a shape (eg, -gammafit 2.25 1.25)
doug
Ben Letham wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
It says "no such file or directory". Does it exist?
doug
Jürgen Hänggi wrote:
> Dear FS experts
>
> I tried to run mri_surf2surf on parcellations produced by
> mris_divide_parcellation but there is the following problem:
>
> [Juergen-Haenggis-Mac-Pro:/Applications/freesurfer/subjects] juergenhaen
Yes, the paradigm came from optseq2 with a PSD window 0 19.2 0.4.
Looking more into the details, it seems that the design is pretty
ill-conditioned, cond(Xn'*Xn) is 6.2e5, and the cut-off in
fast_selxavg3.m is 1e4.
Like I said, the design came from optseq2 and the cost/efficiency is
the same as o
try it with a prestim of 0
Ben Letham wrote:
> Yes, the paradigm came from optseq2 with a PSD window 0 19.2 0.4.
>
> Looking more into the details, it seems that the design is pretty
> ill-conditioned, cond(Xn'*Xn) is 6.2e5, and the cut-off in
> fast_selxavg3.m is 1e4.
>
> Like I said, the design
Dear list,
I am about to start processing a largish longitudinal dataset and wondered
whether I could save some processing time in the following ways:
1) I have seen written in a few places that only norm.mgz is used from the
cross-sectional stream during base template creation at the next stage.
12 matches
Mail list logo