Hi all,
I have a question.
In the table created from asegstats2table, are the volumes standardized
to Talairach space?
or are they in their orig space?
thank in advanced,
anita
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr
Check ulimit -m
That's the max mem per process.
ulimit -m 0
Maybe will help.
-- Pedro Paulo Jr
E71 Nokia
-Msg original-
De: Jürgen Hänggi
Enviada: 01/07/2009 02:36:36
Para: Freesurfer Mailinglist
Assunto: [Freesurfer] Cannot allocate memory / can't allocate region
Dear FS experts
Hi Juergen,
how much ram do you have in the machine?
Bruce
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Jürgen Hänggi
wrote:
Dear FS experts
I am using high resolution (0.75x0.75x0.75 mm) data within FS but the
following error occurred:
...
vertex spacing 0.69 +- 0.21 (0.00-->6.06) (max @ vno 265258 --> 114262
Hi Anita,
no, they are in native space.
cheers,
Bruce
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Anita di Iasio wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question.
In the table created from asegstats2table, are the volumes standardized to
Talairach space?
or are they in their orig space?
thank in advanced,
anita
___
Hi,
We are trying to extract certain regions from FreeSurfer segmentation.
There are couple of regions which are not found in the output files. We
are currently searching for the regions in 13 output files.
The regions are the following: right fornix (508), left fornix (558),
right PLIC (158),
Hi Judit,
the fornix is labeled in the aseg, not the parcellation, although this is
not the default). If you rerun mri_cc with the -fornix option it will write
a volume named mri/fornix.mgz with the fornix in it.
cheers,
Bruce
On Wed,
1 Jul 2009, Judit Haasz wrote:
Hi,
We are trying to
Can I have the volumes in the standardize space?
Thanks, anita
2009/7/1 Bruce Fischl
> Hi Anita,
>
> no, they are in native space.
>
> cheers,
> Bruce
>
> On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Anita di Iasio wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>> I have a question.
>> In the table created from asegstats2table, are the volumes st
Hi,
my follow up question would be, how much has changed regarding fsaverage
between freesurfer version 4.1.0 and 4.3.1? Is the added insula label the
only change that has been made? Besides, when I load both annotations, the
old and the new one, it seems to me almost every border of the parcella
Hello,
I am trying to run a cortical thickness analysis to look for an interaction
between two continuous variables using mri_glmfit. I created an fsgd file
including only the two original CVs to investigate main effects and obtained
the output. When I added the interaction term (product of th
If you don't have FSL installed, then yes it will need to be.
doug
dah...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Perhaps I should have asked:
Do I need to separately install FSL?
Thanks
Hi,
I ran the following preproc-sess command and mkbrainmask-sess failed, with
an error message of not finding fsma
This can happen if the covariates have a very different scale (eg, age
in years and something else in the range of 1-2). The product may have a
different range as well. The product may be highly correlated with the
first two CVs
doug
Susie Heo wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to run a cortical thic
Hi:
I am using Freesurfer and FSL together. My image dimensions initially are
256x256x128 in nii.gz format. I convert these images to .mgz using
mri_convert and do cortical and subcoritcal segmentation in FreeSurfer. The
outputs of the segmentation are the converted back into .nii.gz so I can use
t
Try
mri_vol2vol --interp nearest --mov aparc+aseg.mgz --regheader --targ
rawavg.mgz --o aparc+aseg.native.nii.gz
Natalia Sanchez wrote:
Hi:
I am using Freesurfer and FSL together. My image dimensions initially
are 256x256x128 in nii.gz format. I convert these images to .mgz using
mri_
Gurus,
Looking over some stats recently I noticed that if you add up all of the
freesurfer stats for ventricles, namely the left and right lateral
ventricles plus 3rd, 4th, and 5th ventricles and subtract that from the
"Number of Brain Segmentation Voxels" stat, you do not get the value of
the
Dear Freesurfers,
I ran a monte carlo simulation for thickness analyses using mri_glmfit
and found new files in the contrast subdirectory. I was able to figure
out what the first two represent, but was wondering if any one could
clarify what information the rest of the files show:
mc-z.nega
It's because "Brain Segmentation Volume Without Ventricles" stat is
computed with partial volume correction but "Number of Brain Segmentation Voxels" stat
is not. Please refer to this wiki for more info.
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BrainVolume
Sita
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Jared
16 matches
Mail list logo