[Freesurfer] qdec start

2009-06-15 Thread Jose Soares
Hi all, I am starting with qdec and i have a simple question. I have 30 recon-all subjects but I didn't do the -qcache option.  1- I want to know if I need to run this -qcache option even if I use the fsaverage target subject, or this is only necessary if se my own average subject? 2- Where do I

RES: [Freesurfer] qdec start

2009-06-15 Thread ppj
Jose. 1) Yes. You should run -qcache 2) Yes. This file is used to describe your experiment. You can have more details in the FreeSurfer tutorial for group analysis. PPJ -- Pedro Paulo Jr E71 Nokia -Msg original- De: Jose Soares Enviada: 15/06/2009 06:38:02 Para: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.har

[Freesurfer] Re: Freesurfer Digest, Vol 62, Issue 53 (fwd)

2009-06-15 Thread Narly A Golestani
Hi there, I have a question regarding the longitudinal processing stream in the new release. I've already analyzed my data at different time points using the cross-sectional processing stream using the previous version of freesurfer, and would like to know if this is the same as doing so with th

Re: [Freesurfer] manual talairach details

2009-06-15 Thread Deane Aikins
Hi Bruce- Agreed. Visual check of talairach looks good and manual correction of slight sagital angle fails to improve z value, hence the current notal-check. Looking at recon-all.log, there is a statement that The surface validation has detected a possible Error", with a suggestion to use the '

Re: [Freesurfer] manual talairach details

2009-06-15 Thread Bruce Fischl
Did you check the skull strip? You can send it to us if you want and we will take a look. On Jun 15, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Deane Aikins wrote: Hi Bruce- Agreed. Visual check of talairach looks good and manual correction of slight sagital angle fails to improve z value, hence the curr

Re: [Freesurfer] manual talairach details

2009-06-15 Thread Deane Aikins
It is a bad skull strip. I am increasing watershed param and will try autorecon2. Deane Quoting Bruce Fischl : > Did you check the skull strip? You can send it to us if you want and > we will take a look. > > > > On Jun 15, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Deane Aikins > wrote: > > > > > Hi Bruce- > > > >

[Freesurfer] remove random factor

2009-06-15 Thread Dana W. Moore
Hi all, I have run the same image twice with recon-all and gotten different results for the cortical parcellation, with regions of the cortex differing an average of 2% in volume and the biggest difference being 11% (left bankssts). This is on a healthy, elderly brain. I'd like to try runnin

Re: [Freesurfer] remove random factor

2009-06-15 Thread Allison Stevens
Dana, I believe you can achieve this by running recon-all on the subjects with the -norandomness flag. Unless you are using a version of FreeSurfer that is older than v3.0.4 - let me know if you are. -- On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Dana W. Moore wrote: Hi all, I have run the same image twice with

[Freesurfer] images with poor resolution

2009-06-15 Thread Dana W. Moore
Hi all, I have a couple images that have poor gray-white boundaries, and the cortical parcellation did not come out well. Is there any way to manipulate thresholds to try to enhance the gray-white segmentation? Thanks, Dana Dana W. Moore, Ph.D. Neuropsychology Fellow Cornell Neuropsycholo