Those CVS images look about right to me for CVS, so I don't think you've
done anything wrong. You could do the reg in two parts: (1) run
mni152reg to register the anatomical to the mni152, and (2) run
bbregister (6dof) to register the fMRI to the anatomical. Then
concatenate them into one regis
External Email - Use Caution
Alright thanks, mri_coreg looks a little better than bbregister. But similar to
bbregister, using 6 dof results in a brain that is a little too small and using
12 dof has both scaling and translation issues.
What would be the way to use CVS? I tried
Use mri_coreg instead of bbregister. Make sure to use 12 DOF. You could
use CVS as well since that is non-linear
On 05/07/2018 04:11 PM, David Beeler wrote:
>
>
> Hi Doug,
> Ok so if I am understanding correctly, SPM or FSL will be better at
> registering functional data to CVS or MNI space for
External Email - Use Caution
Hi Doug,
Ok so if I am understanding correctly, SPM or FSL will be better at registering
functional data to CVS or MNI space for group analyses than freesurfer will be
because they have the capability of doing nonlinear registrations. If that's
the
If that is really what you want to do, you should use a tool appropriate
for this type of analysis (eg, SPM and FSL have non-linear intersubject
registration)
On 05/04/2018 01:13 PM, David Beeler wrote:
>
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> funcVol is an individual functional resting state scan. We are doing
> s
External Email - Use Caution
Hi Doug,
funcVol is an individual functional resting state scan. We are doing some
clustering analyses and trying to visually compare the clustering across
subjects (I would be a bit sketched out trying to quantify the overlap between
subjects due t
What is funcVol? An individual functional? If so, then use --12 (12 dof
to account for scaling). In general, we don't recommend doing cross
subject registration with BBR as it is really not appropriate for that
kind of thing.
On 05/03/2018 01:30 PM, David Beeler wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying