it seems likely you will want to rescan.
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 12 Jun 2017, Gullickson, James wrote:
> Bruce,
> Thanks for the input. We use a 32 channel head coil with two elements: an
> anterior one, and a posterior one. Thus, half of the coil was inactive. I
> ran the subject through the stan
Bruce,
Thanks for the input. We use a 32 channel head coil with two elements: an
anterior one, and a posterior one. Thus, half of the coil was inactive. I
ran the subject through the standard recon -all just to see what happened,
and it looks like there were some significant errors (see attached i
Hi James
it's hard to say. How many coil elements were off? You could try with
anterior control points, but you might not be able to include this subject
in a group study
cheers
Bruce
On Sun, 11 Jun 2017, Gullickson,
James wrote:
> Hello all,
> We have a subject whose T1s were collected with