sure, it will preserve the 0.9mm which should help a bit if you have enough
SNR
On Tue, 24 Jan
2017, Alex Cohen wrote:
It was more a question of:Should the -hires switch be used if you're just
interested in subcortical parcellation, and your data happens to be 0.9mm,
etc... or is this featur
It was more a question of:
Should the -hires switch be used if you're just interested in subcortical
parcellation, and your data happens to be 0.9mm, etc... or is this feature
aimed at ex-vivo data or similar data.
-Alex
Alexander
generating the subcortical atlas:
recon-all now produces aseg.mgz (subcortical atlas) with Hi-Res data
(<1mm). The -hires flag is still necessary to include with recon-all when
hi-res data is input. Changes to mri_normalize, mri_em_register and
mri_watershed were made to support this feature.
--
sorry, I still don't understand. Are you really trying to generate a
subcortical atlas? Or do you mean a subcortical segmentation? If the
latter, then 1mm is fine. The resolution you want really depends on what
you are trying to do
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017, Alex Cohen wrote:
> generating the subcor
Hi Alex
cut it for what?
Bruce
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017, Alex Cohen wrote:
> So what resolution would make sense to use? the release notes say <1.0mm but
> would 0.9mm isovol really cut it?
> -Alex
>
>
> Alexander Li Cohen, M.D., Ph.D
