sure, it will preserve the 0.9mm which should help a bit if you have enough SNR

On Tue, 24 Jan 2017, Alex Cohen wrote:

It was more a question of:Should the -hires switch be used if you're just
interested in subcortical parcellation, and your data happens to be 0.9mm,
etc... or is this feature aimed at ex-vivo data or similar data.
-Alex


----------------------------------------------------------------
Alexander Li Cohen, M.D., Ph.D.
E-mail: alexander.coh...@childrens.harvard.edu (Medical/Science Email)
E-mail: alexco...@gmail.com (Lifetime Email)
----------------------------------------------------------------

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
wrote:
      sorry, I still don't understand. Are you really trying to
      generate a subcortical atlas? Or do you mean a subcortical
      segmentation? If the
      latter, then 1mm is fine.  The resolution you want really
      depends on what you are trying to do

      On Tue, 24 Jan 2017, Alex Cohen wrote:

            generating the subcortical atlas:
            recon-all now produces aseg.mgz (subcortical atlas)
            with Hi-Res data (<1mm).
            The -hires flag is still necessary to include with
            recon-all when hi-res
            data is input. Changes to mri_normalize,
            mri_em_register and mri_watershed
            were made to support this feature.


            ----------------------------------------------------------------
            Alexander Li Cohen, M.D., Ph.D.
            E-mail: alexander.coh...@childrens.harvard.edu
            (Medical/Science Email)
            E-mail: alexco...@gmail.com (Lifetime Email)
            ----------------------------------------------------------------

            On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Bruce Fischl
            <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
            wrote:
                  Hi Alex

                  cut it for what?

                  Bruce

                  On Tue, 24 Jan 2017, Alex Cohen wrote:

                        So what resolution would make sense to
            use? the
                        release notes say <1.0mm but
                        would 0.9mm isovol really cut it?
                        -Alex

                       
            ----------------------------------------------------------------
                        Alexander Li Cohen, M.D., Ph.D.
                        E-mail:
            alexander.coh...@childrens.harvard.edu
                        (Medical/Science Email)
                        E-mail: alexco...@gmail.com (Lifetime
            Email)
                       
            ----------------------------------------------------------------




            The information in this e-mail is intended only for
            the person to whom
            it is
            addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to
            you in error and the
            e-mail
            contains patient information, please contact the
            Partners Compliance
            HelpLine at
            http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the
            e-mail was sent to you
            in error
            but does not contain patient information, please
            contact the sender
            and properly
            dispose of the e-mail.






_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to