Re: [Freesurfer] Different significant regions with different cluster wise thresholds

2014-12-18 Thread Bronwyn Overs
Hi Doug, Thanks, that makes it very clear. Kind regards, Bronwyn Overs Research Assistant Neuroscience Research Australia Neuroscience Research Australia Margarete Ainsworth Building Barker Street Randwick Sydney NSW 2031 Australia *M* 0411 308 769 *T* +61 2 9399 1883 *F* +61 2 9399 1265 neu

Re: [Freesurfer] Different significant regions with different cluster wise thresholds

2014-12-18 Thread Douglas N Greve
OK, I've figured out what's going on. The cluster @ threshold of 1.3 in superior temporal breaks up into 3 very small clusters when the threshold is changed to 2.0, none of which are significant. There is a cluster in middle temporal at 1.3 but it is not very significant (p=.17), but it stays

Re: [Freesurfer] Different significant regions with different cluster wise thresholds

2014-12-17 Thread Bronwyn Overs
Hi Doug, The problem is with the "int_genderXgroup" contrast (between .05 & .01 cluster forming thresholds). Kind regards, Bronwyn Overs Research Assistant Neuroscience Research Australia Neuroscience Research Australia Margarete Ainsworth Building Barker Street Randwick Sydney NSW 2031 Aus

Re: [Freesurfer] Different significant regions with different cluster wise thresholds

2014-12-17 Thread Douglas N Greve
There are a bunch of contrasts there. Which one had the discrepancy? doug On 12/15/2014 07:43 PM, Bronwyn Overs wrote: > Hi Douglas, > > I uploaded my glmdir to you on the 3/12/14 (named > site-gender-group-prothaplotype.area.lh.glmdir.zip). Can you see what > the problem is? > > Kind regards,

Re: [Freesurfer] Different significant regions with different cluster wise thresholds

2014-12-15 Thread Bronwyn Overs
Hi Douglas, I uploaded my glmdir to you on the 3/12/14 (named site-gender-group-prothaplotype.area.lh.glmdir.zip). Can you see what the problem is? Kind regards, Bronwyn Overs Research Assistant Neuroscience Research Australia Neuroscience Research Australia Margarete Ainsworth Building Ba

Re: [Freesurfer] Different significant regions with different cluster wise thresholds

2014-11-26 Thread Douglas Greve
Through the file drop at the end of this email. But you might want to wait until next week as I will be out of the office until Dec 4. doug On 11/26/14 12:50 AM, Bronwyn Overs wrote: Hi Douglas, How exactly should I upload the glmdir? Kind regards, Bronwyn Overs Research Assistant Neuroscie

Re: [Freesurfer] Different significant regions with different cluster wise thresholds

2014-11-26 Thread Bronwyn Overs
Thanks Douglas, I will upload it then. Kind regards, Bronwyn Overs Research Assistant Neuroscience Research Australia Neuroscience Research Australia Margarete Ainsworth Building Barker Street Randwick Sydney NSW 2031 Australia *M* 0411 308 769 *T* +61 2 9399 1883 *F* +61 2 9399 1265 neura.ed

Re: [Freesurfer] Different significant regions with different cluster wise thresholds

2014-11-25 Thread Bronwyn Overs
Hi Douglas, How exactly should I upload the glmdir? Kind regards, Bronwyn Overs Research Assistant Neuroscience Research Australia Neuroscience Research Australia Margarete Ainsworth Building Barker Street Randwick Sydney NSW 2031 Australia *M* 0411 308 769 *T* +61 2 9399 1883 *F* +61 2 9399

Re: [Freesurfer] Different significant regions with different cluster wise thresholds

2014-11-10 Thread Douglas N Greve
Can you upload the gtlmdir and I'll take a look? On 11/06/2014 08:19 PM, Bronwyn Overs wrote: > I believe it is the cluster-forming threshold. I was running the > following: > mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir site-gender-group-prothaplotype.glmdir --cache > 1.3 abs --cwpvalthresh 0.05 --2spaces > mri_g

Re: [Freesurfer] Different significant regions with different cluster wise thresholds

2014-11-06 Thread Bronwyn Overs
I believe it is the cluster-forming threshold. I was running the following: mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir site-gender-group-prothaplotype.glmdir --cache 1.3 abs --cwpvalthresh 0.05 --2spaces mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir site-gender-group-prothaplotype.glmdir --cache 2 abs --cwpvalthresh 0.05 --2spaces

Re: [Freesurfer] Different significant regions with different cluster wise thresholds

2014-11-06 Thread Douglas N Greve
Do you mean cluster-wise threshold or cluster-forming threshold? On 11/06/2014 01:12 AM, Bronwyn Overs wrote: > Dear Freesurfer Mailing list, > > While running a glm anlaysis with monte carlo correction (using > cluster wise thresholds of .05 & .01), I encountered the following issue: > When exa