Hi Douglas,
How exactly should I upload the glmdir?
Kind regards,
Bronwyn Overs
Research Assistant
Neuroscience Research Australia
Neuroscience Research Australia
Margarete Ainsworth Building
Barker Street Randwick Sydney NSW 2031 Australia
*M* 0411 308 769 *T* +61 2 9399 1883 *F* +61 2 9399 1265
neura.edu.au <http://neura.edu.au>
Follow @neuraustralia on twitter
<https://twitter.com/neuraustralia>Follow NeuRA on facebook
<https://www.facebook.com/NeuroscienceResearchAustralia>Subscribe to the
NeuRA Magazine <http://www.neura.edu.au/help-research/subscribe>
On 11/11/2014 4:19 am, Douglas N Greve wrote:
Can you upload the gtlmdir and I'll take a look?
On 11/06/2014 08:19 PM, Bronwyn Overs wrote:
I believe it is the cluster-forming threshold. I was running the
following:
mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir site-gender-group-prothaplotype.glmdir --cache
1.3 abs --cwpvalthresh 0.05 --2spaces
mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir site-gender-group-prothaplotype.glmdir --cache
2 abs --cwpvalthresh 0.05 --2spaces
Kind regards,
Bronwyn Overs
Research Assistant
Neuroscience Research Australia
Neuroscience Research Australia
Margarete Ainsworth Building
Barker Street Randwick Sydney NSW 2031 Australia
*M* 0411 308 769 *T* +61 2 9399 1883 *F* +61 2 9399 1265
neura.edu.au <http://neura.edu.au>
Follow @neuraustralia on twitter
<https://twitter.com/neuraustralia>Follow NeuRA on facebook
<https://www.facebook.com/NeuroscienceResearchAustralia>Subscribe to
the NeuRA Magazine <http://www.neura.edu.au/help-research/subscribe>
On 7/11/2014 4:03 am, Douglas N Greve wrote:
Do you mean cluster-wise threshold or cluster-forming threshold?
On 11/06/2014 01:12 AM, Bronwyn Overs wrote:
Dear Freesurfer Mailing list,
While running a glm anlaysis with monte carlo correction (using
cluster wise thresholds of .05 & .01), I encountered the following issue:
When examining the clusters formed for each of the different cluster
wise thresholds, the .05 threshold resulted in a superior temporal
cluster, while the .01 threshold resulted in a two lateral occipital
clusters that did not overlap with the cluster from the .05 threshold.
Do you know why there would be no overlap between significant regions
at different cluster wise thresholds? I was aware that a cluster which
is significant at .05 may split or be smaller at .01, but I do not
know why entirely different regions would be significant.
--
Kind regards,
Bronwyn Overs
Research Assistant
Neuroscience Research Australia
Neuroscience Research Australia
Margarete Ainsworth Building
Barker Street Randwick Sydney NSW 2031 Australia
*M* 0411 308 769 *T* +61 2 9399 1883 *F* +61 2 9399 1265
neura.edu.au<http://neura.edu.au>
Follow @neuraustralia on twitter
<https://twitter.com/neuraustralia>Follow NeuRA on facebook
<https://www.facebook.com/NeuroscienceResearchAustralia>Subscribe to
the NeuRA Magazine<http://www.neura.edu.au/help-research/subscribe>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
