1 would be better but 2 would be sufficient as long as X, Y and Z don't
vary too much
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Ashley Shurick wrote:
Hi Bruce (and others),
We can balance the numbers to allow the same number in each configuration.
But just to clarify, are you saying we should do, for example, 10 pa
Hi Bruce (and others),
We can balance the numbers to allow the same number in each configuration.
But just to clarify, are you saying we should do, for example, 10 patient
scan 1, 10 patient scan 2, 10 patient scan 3, and 10 HC scan 1, 10 HC scan
2, 10 HC scan 3, to perfectly balance everything ou
Hi Ashley
that is probably trouble unless your groups are perfectly balanced across
the datasets (that is, the same # in each group were scanned on each
configuration).
cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 11 Mar 2014,
Ashley Shurick wrote:
Hi,
I'm interested in comparing CT differences between 2 diffe
