Hi all,
I want to study Brodmann Areas cortical thickness, surface area and
volume. I've added the 5.2 BAxxx.threshold.label to my 5.0 fsaverage
and run the recon-all BA labels command. Now I run aparcstats2table
and get a table with the values but they are the same as before
running the B
Ok, that was my guess... I am running against a deadline, any news on
automatically computing the correct threshold script? Will I be able
to use it in 5.0?
Thanks you!
Andreia
Quoting Bruce Fischl :
> yes. Surface area will be the affected much more than thickness (and
> volume of cours
yes. Surface area will be the affected much more than thickness (and volume
of course scales with area)
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013, _andre...@sapo.pt wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Thank you for the quick response!
>
> In the meanwhile, does that also apply to cortical thickness and volume?
>
> Thank you!
>
>
Hi Bruce,
Thank you for the quick response!
In the meanwhile, does that also apply to cortical thickness and volume?
Thank you!
Andreia
Quoting Bruce Fischl :
> Hi Andreia
>
> the issue is that the BA labels contain every point that has any non-zero
> probability (no matter how small!) of bei
Hi Andreia
the issue is that the BA labels contain every point that has any non-zero
probability (no matter how small!) of being in that label. So the total
label area is almost certainly always bigger than the actual BA. Anastasia
has some scripts for automatically computing the correct thresh
