follow the surface of the wm volume, and if there is anyway
to fix it?
Thanks,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Doug Greve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 9/20/2005 4:03 AM
To: Fornito, Alexander
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Autorecon re-
2:19 PM
To: Fornito, Alexander
Cc: Doug Greve; freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject:RE: [Freesurfer] Autorecon re-processing
probably susceptibility problems. Try putting some control points in the
wm, but there may not be enough g/w contrast to get good surfaces.
On Tue,
20
surface of the wm volume, and if there is anyway
to fix it?
Thanks,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Doug Greve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 9/20/2005 4:03 AM
To: Fornito, Alexander
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Autorecon re-processing
exander
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Autorecon re-processing
does your version not tell you these things when you run -help?
Fornito, Alexander wrote:
>HI,
>Just wanted to check a few things re: re-running autorecon.
>I'm guessing that r
does your version not tell you these things when you run -help?
Fornito, Alexander wrote:
HI,
Just wanted to check a few things re: re-running autorecon.
I'm guessing that re-running autorecon with the -pial flag re-runs
make_final_surfaces, which takes about 4-6 hours (correct?).
What is
