From: Bruce Fischl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 7/14/2005 8:04 AM
To: Fornito, Alexander
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] Anatomical stats for labels
the label is identified by the vertex indices, which allow it to
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] Anatomical stats for labels
the label is identified by the vertex indices, which allow it to be
projected onto any surface.
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Fornito, Alexander wrote:
-
From: Bruce Fischl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 7/13/2005 9:32 PM
To: Fornito, Alexander
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] Anatomical stats for labels
yes, if you specify pial it will be the pial surface area
: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] Anatomical stats for labels
yes, if you specify pial it will be the pial surface area.
On Wed, 13 Jul
2005, Fornito, Alexander wrote:
> Cool, thanks.
> O
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Anatomical stats for labels
Hi Alex,
that's a bug - the volume is the total of the surface area of each
triangle times the average thickness there, so the pial will be different
from the white (should just take the average of t
s
included.
Hope this makes sense!
Thanks,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Fischl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 7/12/2005 1:09 AM
To: Fornito, Alexander
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Anatomical stats for labels
Hi Alex,
th
Hi Alex,
that's a bug - the volume is the total of the surface area of each
triangle times the average thickness there, so the pial will be different
from the white (should just take the average of the two)
Bruce
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Fornito, Alexander wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that when I r
