Re: [Freesurfer] sig.sum files shows more clusters than sig.mgh image

2016-08-26 Thread Oana Georgiana Rus
Dear Doug, I tried using --o instead of --ocp. *Neither the sig.sum nor the sig.mgh file change.* *So i dont see the postcentral cluster neither after running it with --o in sig.mgh.* But the cluster is present in the sig.sum file. i am not sure why it could be like that. Best Georgiana

Re: [Freesurfer] sig.sum files shows more clusters than sig.mgh image

2016-08-25 Thread Douglas N Greve
Try using --o instead of --ocp On 08/25/2016 05:50 AM, Oana Georgiana Rus wrote: > > Dear Doug, > > thanks a lot for responding. Here my command lines and attached the image. > > *So command line to perform the GLM analysis and get the sig.mgh file > was:* > > mri_glmfit --y > /data_august/Geo/

Re: [Freesurfer] sig.sum files shows more clusters than sig.mgh image

2016-08-25 Thread Oana Georgiana Rus
Dear Doug, thanks a lot for responding. Here my command lines and attached the image. *So command line to perform the GLM analysis and get the sig.mgh file was:* mri_glmfit --y /data_august/Geo/freesurfer_OCD/freesurf_steps/2_mris_preproc/education_out/rh.all_gender_age.volume.10.mgh \ --f

Re: [Freesurfer] sig.sum files shows more clusters than sig.mgh image

2016-08-23 Thread Douglas N Greve
Can you send the command line, the sum file, and a pic of the surface? On 08/23/2016 04:39 AM, Oana Georgiana Rus wrote: > > Dear Freesurfer experts, > > I have run an analysis on GM Volume in Freesurfer. > > The interested contrast was patients vs. controls. (/command mri_glimfit/) > > I then ra

[Freesurfer] sig.sum files shows more clusters than sig.mgh image

2016-08-23 Thread Oana Georgiana Rus
Dear Freesurfer experts, I have run an analysis on GM Volume in Freesurfer. The interested contrast was patients vs. controls. (/command mri_glimfit/) I then ran /mri_surfcluster/ command to get a text file with the significant clusters FDRcorrected and their peak coordinatesn- resulting in a