are you sure it's registered well to the anatomical/surface?
On Thu, 7 Jul
2011, Michelle Umali wrote:
> Hi Doug,
> The eccen and polar maps look ok, although activation tends to be
> limited to the occipital poles and lateral surface not really along
> the calcarine.
>
> Is it possible to find o
Hi Doug,
The eccen and polar maps look ok, although activation tends to be
limited to the occipital poles and lateral surface not really along
the calcarine.
Is it possible to find out how the colors in the eccen and polar
images correspond to positions in the stimulus using rtview? There's
Hi Michelle, do the eccen and polar maps look ok? Also, I would probably
smooth them a little bit. The field sign calculation is basically a
spatial derivative so it can be sensitive to noise.
doug
Michelle Umali wrote:
> Dear all,
> I've been having issues with my fieldsign images all I g
Dear all,
I've been having issues with my fieldsign images all I get are
speckles. I did the following and did not get any errors:
1) ran recon-all -all
2) cut and saved occipital patches (rh.occip.patch.3d) from inflated surface
3) ran mris_flatten -w 0 distances 20 7 rh.occip.patch.3d
