It is a bad skull strip. I am increasing watershed param and will try
autorecon2.
Deane
Quoting Bruce Fischl :
> Did you check the skull strip? You can send it to us if you want and
> we will take a look.
>
>
>
> On Jun 15, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Deane Aikins
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Bruce-
> >
> >
Did you check the skull strip? You can send it to us if you want and
we will take a look.
On Jun 15, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Deane Aikins
wrote:
Hi Bruce-
Agreed. Visual check of talairach looks good and manual correction
of slight
sagital angle fails to improve z value, hence the curr
Hi Bruce-
Agreed. Visual check of talairach looks good and manual correction of slight
sagital angle fails to improve z value, hence the current notal-check.
Looking at recon-all.log, there is a statement that The surface validation has
detected a possible Error", with a suggestion to use the '
Hi Deanne,
something is badly wrong - that step should only take a couple of minutes.
Did you check the talairach visually? It may need to be manually corrected.
cheers
Bruce
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Deane Aikins wrote:
I'm rerunning it with -no-talcheck. It looks to be hanging on finding contr
I'm rerunning it with -no-talcheck. It looks to be hanging on finding control
points in the Left_Cerebral_White_matter. Can this one step take more than 24
hrs? The "usual" time for a recon-all was @30 hrs for the other brains.
Thanks,
Deane
Quoting Nick Schmansky :
> Deane,
>
> the -no-tal
Deane,
the -no-talcheck flag is your best option now, considering that a manual
alignment is no better than the automatic.
What is the age range of your subjects? We're implementing an alternate
target consisting of young adults scanned at 3T, which works better for
that cohort over the adults i
Hello,
I had a Talairach QA check failure, with the error log indicating a Z = -8 which
was below the criterion of z =-6.
I then used tkregister2 to attempt a manual alignment (no surf orig was
available). After visual inspection, the subject and Talairach volumes looked
really closely aligned
