Thanks for quick response Bruce. We will use the volume from ex-vivo
stats..
Regarding the need to integrate the ex vivo one back into aparc+aseg.
We noticed the entorhinal volume in aparc is larger than that in
exvivo.stats.
So do the extra entorhinal voxels in aparc need to be re-labelled as
"
Hi Mehul
the entorhinal label in the aparc was drawn by Rahul based on gyral
landmarks. The one in the _exvivo.stats is based on being able to see the
layer II islands in ex vivo MRI and hence we believe it is more accurate.
Not sure why you need to integrate the ex vivo one back into the
apa
Hi Folks,
I have a question about entorhinal cortex volume. The entorhinal cortex is
listed in ?h.aparc.stats and ?h.entorhinal_exvivo.stats. In a previous
post on the mailing list, it was mentioned that we should use the volume
measurement from ?h.entorhinal_exvivo.stats.
We would like to make
Another basic question:
Could you tell me what is the best way of putting the
?h.entorhinal_exvivo.stats into a spreadsheet for all subjects? Is there a way
to achieve a textfile output for all subjects similar in concept to
kvlQuantifyHippocampalSubfieldSegmentations.sh ?
catherine_
Hi Catherine
I guess I would recommend the ex vivo one since it is based explicitly on
architecontics and not on guessing locations from folds.
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Cat Chong wrote:
Hello experts,
I am very new to freesurfer so please excuse my basic question:
We want to get
Hello experts,
I am very new to freesurfer so please excuse my basic question:
We want to get measurements of entorhinal cortex volumes on a group of people.
I found these results listed in ?h.aparc.stats.
I also noticed another ?h.entorhinal_exvivo.stats, with different results.
Which shou
