Hi Mehul

the entorhinal label in the aparc was drawn by Rahul based on gyral landmarks. The one in the _exvivo.stats is based on being able to see the layer II islands in ex vivo MRI and hence we believe it is more accurate. Not sure why you need to integrate the ex vivo one back into the aparc+aseg, can you clarify?

cheers
Bruce


On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Mehul Sampat wrote:

Hi Folks, 
I have a question about entorhinal cortex volume. The entorhinal cortex is 
listed in ?h.aparc.stats and ?h.entorhinal_exvivo.stats.  In a previous post on
the mailing list, it was mentioned that we should use the volume measurement 
from ?h.entorhinal_exvivo.stats.

We would like to make manual corrections to the entorhinal cortex segmentation 
(when required). For this task I can create a entorhinal volume from 
?h.entorhinal_exvivo.label
using  mri_label2vol

This entorhinal volume will be different from the one in aparc+aseg.mgz

My question is: 
Has anyone published any protocols to somehow combine the two entorhinal 
volumes ?

Or is recommend to take the take the entorhinal volume created from 
?h.entorhinal_exvivo.stats. 
and overlay it on norm.mgz and edit manually (when required).
One limitation of this approach is that it would be hard to integrate this 
entorhinal volume back into 
aparc+aseg.mgz...

Thanks
Mehul




On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> 
wrote:
      Hi Catherine

      I guess I would recommend the ex vivo one since it is based explicitly on 
architecontics and not on guessing locations from folds.

      cheers
      Bruce


      On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Cat Chong wrote:

            Hello experts,

            I am  very new to freesurfer so please excuse my basic question:
            We want to get measurements of entorhinal cortex volumes on a group 
of
            people. I found these results listed in  ?h.aparc.stats.
            I also noticed another ?h.entorhinal_exvivo.stats, with different 
results.
            Which should I use for a group analysis of entorhinal volume and 
surface
            area, and why are the results very different?

            very best regards,
            catherine




_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to