Hi Gabor
the only way is to look at the parcellation over the white surface I guess.
There are some not-very-well documented interventions, but maybe your best
bet would be just to exclude subjects (since it almost never fails)
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016, Gabor Perlaki
wrote:
> Dear
Dear Bruce,
Thank you for your answer. We will check the pial and white surfaces, but
how to check the accuracy of the cortical parcellation beyond that? We
don't find any suggestion on Freesurfer's troubleshooting page how to
realize or correct such an error, where the pial and white surfaces are
Hi Gabor,
it depends on what you are doing. What you describe is sufficient for
maps/structure volumes, but for example if you wanted to measure thickness
within parcels you would have to check the accuracy of the cortical
parcellation
cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016, Gabor Perlaki wrote:
Sorry to repost my question. I would appreciate any reply.
Best Regards,
Gabor
2016-06-13 10:51 GMT+02:00 Gabor Perlaki :
> Dear all,
>
> I've a lot of patients and we are looking for the fastest solution to
> check the output of Freesurfer. On the troubleshooting page (
> https://surfer.nmr.mgh
Dear all,
I've a lot of patients and we are looking for the fastest solution to check
the output of Freesurfer. On the troubleshooting page (
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/TroubleshootingData)
there are a lot of steps to check, but I think not all of that should be
done to f
