I found the option here <
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/docs/recon-all.help.txt>
And out of curiosity, I ran autorecon 1 followed by -subcort-seg then
mri_segstats and see how large the difference is and using the faster
computational approach most of the subcortical ROI volumes were slightly
what is -nosphere? I don't think it'sa recon-all option, is it?
I guess I would recommend running things all the way through unless you
really don't have the compute time/disk space
cheers
Bruce
On Sun, 1
May 2016, Taha Abdullah wrote:
Hello Burce,
Thank you for the reply, I see well I
Hello Burce,
Thank you for the reply, I see well I would want to use the surfaces then.
Would you recommend something like running recon-all and using -nosphere?
-Taha
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Bruce Fischl
wrote:
> Hi Taha
>
> you can, but it won't be as accurate since the surfaces giv
Hi Taha
you can, but it won't be as accurate since the surfaces give better
estimates of cortex and such (and we use them to automatically correct
the aseg). You can run the individual steps through the end of mri_ca_label
if you want to stop there
cheers
Bruce
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016, Taha Abd
Hello All,
I am running an analysis strictly on subcortical volumes, and to save time
and disk space I wanted to avoid if possible construction of surfaces and
seems that it is necessary? I first ran recon-all -autorecon1, second I ran
recon-all -subcortseg and the final error was regarding no su
