, Stefano
*Betreff:* Re: [Freesurfer] Problem with longitudinal processing (MS
lesions/samseg)
On 6/20/2022 3:03 AM, Wittayer, Matthias wrote:
*External Email - Use Caution *
Hi, thanks for your answer.
Yes I did the longitudinal runs using the base as described in the
arvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] Problem with longitudinal processing
When you say they are growing rather than shrinking, do you mean in the
longitudnial recon-all run? The reason I ask is that you only mention the base
and cross. When you do the lon
*Von:* freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
im Auftrag von Douglas N.
Greve
*Gesendet:* Sonntag, 19. Juni 2022 16:58:18
*An:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
*Betreff:* Re: [Freesurfer] Problem with longitudinal processing
When you say they are growing rather than shrinking, do you mean in
the lo
...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
im Auftrag von Douglas N. Greve
Gesendet: Sonntag, 19. Juni 2022 16:58:18
An: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] Problem with longitudinal processing
When you say they are growing rather than shrinking, do you mean in the
longitudnial recon-all run? The
When you say they are growing rather than shrinking, do you mean in the
longitudnial recon-all run? The reason I ask is that you only mention
the base and cross. When you do the longitudinal analysis, you need to
do cross, then base, then long.
On 6/15/2022 11:43 AM, Wittayer, Matthias wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Dear community,
I tried to process MS- patient's MRIs (mostly same scanner, same settings)
Longitudinally over a long period of time. I first processed all timeponits
crosssectionally and then initialised the base image by recon- all - base TP1
TP2
