0.47 |
0.809017
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
on behalf of Douglas N. Greve
Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 10:16 AM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Petsurfer: Gtmstats < 1, voxel wise mean is fine
Can
:* Re: [Freesurfer] Petsurfer: Gtmstats < 1, voxel wise mean
is fine
What is the value for cerebellum in those three scenarious (gtm, no
pvc, and mgx)?
On 3/10/2020 12:37 PM, Eckbo, Ryan wrote:
Hello experts,
I've recently run into a case the gtmstats uptake (reference region:
cerebe
-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
on behalf of Douglas N. Greve
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 10:01 AM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Petsurfer: Gtmstats < 1, voxel wise mean is fine
What is the value for cerebellum in those three scenarious (gtm, no pvc, and
mgx)?
On 3/10/2020
What is the value for cerebellum in those three scenarious (gtm, no pvc,
and mgx)?
On 3/10/2020 12:37 PM, Eckbo, Ryan wrote:
Hello experts,
I've recently run into a case the gtmstats uptake (reference region:
cerebellum) for the pericarlcarine ROI's are as low as 0.40,
however computing the v
Hello experts,
I've recently run into a case the gtmstats uptake (reference region:
cerebellum) for the pericarlcarine ROI's are as low as 0.40,
however computing the voxel wise mean using input.rescaled.nii.gz and
mgx.ctxgm.nii.gx and aux/seg.nii.gz, the values are closer to 1,
as expected:
|
