Re: [Freesurfer] FDR correction (fwd)

2009-10-19 Thread Douglas N Greve
te: >>> >>>> Here's Tom Nichols explanation. He points out that you use the maximum >>>> i, not the minimum, so you don't have to get past i=1. Thanks Tom! >>>> >>>> >>>> -- Forwarded message -- >>&

Re: [Freesurfer] FDR correction (fwd)

2009-10-19 Thread Donna Dierker
, not the minimum, so you don't have to get past i=1. Thanks Tom! >>> >>> >>> -- Forwarded message -- >>> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:11:09 +0100 >>> From: Thomas Nichols >>> To: Doug Greve >>> Cc: Donna Dierker >>

Re: [Freesurfer] FDR correction (fwd)

2009-10-19 Thread Douglas N Greve
not the minimum, so you don't have to get past i=1. Thanks Tom! >> >> >> -- Forwarded message -- >> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:11:09 +0100 >> From: Thomas Nichols >> To: Doug Greve >> Cc: Donna Dierker >> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer]

Re: [Freesurfer] FDR correction (fwd)

2009-10-19 Thread Donna Dierker
> To: Doug Greve > Cc: Donna Dierker > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] FDR correction (fwd) > > Dear Doug, > > Great discussion! But I think it misses the point. Can you forward the > following to the list? > > The Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) FDR procedure uses the inequality

Re: [Freesurfer] FDR correction (fwd)

2009-10-17 Thread Doug Greve
ubject: Re: [Freesurfer] FDR correction (fwd) Dear Doug, Great discussion! But I think it misses the point. Can you forward the following to the list? The Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) FDR procedure uses the inequality P(i) <= i / V * q for the ordered P-values P(1)<=P(2)<=...<=P(V) and desir